Kaitlyn Mitchell
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Kaitlyn Mitchell has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Scott Orzech Quarrier
Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
4 shared publications - Andrew J. Cho
University of Rochester School of Medicine
2 shared publications - Rajat Jain
Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
2 shared publications - Ronald Rabinowitz
Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642
2 shared publications - Aaron Saxton
Department of Urology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
1 shared publication - Aditya S. Gunturi
School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States of America
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 March 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Urology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 343-346
Reducing pain and opioid use: Implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway for percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an erector spinae plane block
Background: There is no standard analgesic pathway after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. At our institution, an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway was instated that included a preoperative erector spinae plane (ESP) block to improve pain control and minimize opioid usage in the postoperative setting. Materials and methods: At our institution, an ERAS pathway was created for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This pathway involved a preoperative ESP block and the replacement of opioids with multimodal analgesia. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed and placed into 2 cohorts: one cohort participated in the ERAS pathway, whereas the other received traditional pain control. The primary outcome evaluated was postoperative morphine equivalents received. Secondary outcomes included nursing pain scores, opioid prescriptions for home, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics were performed by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and χ 2 tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: Sixty patients were identified in the ERAS cohort versus 70 in the traditional pain control cohort. There was a statistically significant difference in average postoperative morphine equivalents received (17.0 vs. 39.9, p < 0.01) and average postoperative nursing pain score (2.4 vs. 3.6, p < 0.01). Fifty-three percent (32/60) of patients in the ERAS cohort received an opioid prescription for home compared with 80% (56/70) in the traditional cohort (p < 0.01). There was no significant quality-of-life difference between the groups. No adverse patient events resulted from the block. Conclusions: An ERAS pathway including a preoperative ESP block and multimodal analgesia decreased morphine equivalents received and nursing pain scores. Future randomized prospective studies with the ERAS protocol can be considered.
- 28 March 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Urology
- Vol. 19 (5) , 343-346
Open AccessReducing pain and opioid use: Implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway for percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an erector spinae plane block
Background: There is no standard analgesic pathway after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. At our institution, an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway was instated that included a preoperative erector spinae plane (ESP) block to improve pain control and minimize opioid usage in the postoperative setting. Materials and methods: At our institution, an ERAS pathway was created for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This pathway involved a preoperative ESP block and the replacement of opioids with multimodal analgesia. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed and placed into 2 cohorts: one cohort participated in the ERAS pathway, whereas the other received traditional pain control. The primary outcome evaluated was postoperative morphine equivalents received. Secondary outcomes included nursing pain scores, opioid prescriptions for home, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics were performed by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and χ 2 tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: Sixty patients were identified in the ERAS cohort versus 70 in the traditional pain control cohort. There was a statistically significant difference in average postoperative morphine equivalents received (17.0 vs. 39.9, p < 0.01) and average postoperative nursing pain score (2.4 vs. 3.6, p < 0.01). Fifty-three percent (32/60) of patients in the ERAS cohort received an opioid prescription for home compared with 80% (56/70) in the traditional cohort (p < 0.01). There was no significant quality-of-life difference between the groups. No adverse patient events resulted from the block. Conclusions: An ERAS pathway including a preoperative ESP block and multimodal analgesia decreased morphine equivalents received and nursing pain scores. Future randomized prospective studies with the ERAS protocol can be considered.