Tongxin Yuan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Tongxin Yuan has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Zhuosheng Zhang
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
3 shared publications Arman Cohan
Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, USA
1 shared publication- Boheng Li
College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang Ave, Singapore
1 shared publication Dov Greenbaum
Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel
1 shared publication- Fangqi Li
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Gongshen Liu
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 October 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2089-2100
Post-quantum Cryptography in the Wild: Assessing the Readiness of Open-Source Ecosystems
- 7 October 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2089-2100
Open AccessPost-quantum Cryptography in the Wild: Assessing the Readiness of Open-Source Ecosystems
- Open Access
- 27 October 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 11337-11346
Revisiting Data Auditing in Large Vision-Language Models
- 27 October 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 11337-11346
Open AccessRevisiting Data Auditing in Large Vision-Language Models
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 18 September 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-11
Risks of AI scientists: prioritizing safeguarding over autonomy
AI scientists powered by large language models have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that require careful consideration for safety. However, there has been limited comprehensive exploration of these vulnerabilities. This perspective examines vulnerabilities in AI scientists, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse, and emphasizing the need for safety measures. We begin by providing an overview of the potential risks inherent to AI scientists, taking into account user intent, the specific scientific domain, and their potential impact on the external environment. Then, we explore the underlying causes of these vulnerabilities and provide a scoping review of the limited existing works. Based on our analysis, we propose a triadic framework involving human regulation, agent alignment, and an understanding of environmental feedback (agent regulation) to mitigate these identified risks. Furthermore, we highlight the limitations and challenges associated with safeguarding AI scientists and advocate for the development of improved models, robust benchmarks, and comprehensive regulations.
- 18 September 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-11
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessRisks of AI scientists: prioritizing safeguarding over autonomy
AI scientists powered by large language models have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that require careful consideration for safety. However, there has been limited comprehensive exploration of these vulnerabilities. This perspective examines vulnerabilities in AI scientists, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse, and emphasizing the need for safety measures. We begin by providing an overview of the potential risks inherent to AI scientists, taking into account user intent, the specific scientific domain, and their potential impact on the external environment. Then, we explore the underlying causes of these vulnerabilities and provide a scoping review of the limited existing works. Based on our analysis, we propose a triadic framework involving human regulation, agent alignment, and an understanding of environmental feedback (agent regulation) to mitigate these identified risks. Furthermore, we highlight the limitations and challenges associated with safeguarding AI scientists and advocate for the development of improved models, robust benchmarks, and comprehensive regulations.