Ana Rueda Benito
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Ana Rueda Benito has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alejandro Salinas Botrán
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Ana María Arnáiz-García
Internal Medicine Department, Gerencia de Atención Especializada, Áreas III y IV: Hospital Sierrallana y Tres Mares, Servicio Cántabro de Salud, 39300 Torrelavega, Spain
1 shared publication - Diana Ruiz-Cabrera
Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain; Fundació Clinic per la Recerca Biomèdica - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer, Spain
1 shared publication - Elena Bereciartua
Hospital de Cruces
1 shared publication - Fatma Alidrous
Microbiology Department, Sligo University Hospital, F91H684 Sligo, Ireland
1 shared publication - Joan Gómez-Junyent
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (19) , 6705
Real-World Use of Dalbavancin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: PEDDAL Study
Background: Data on antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis are limited. This study aims to describe the real-world effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in treating deep diabetic foot infections. Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in nine Spanish hospitals and one Irish hospital. Patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated with dalbavancin were included. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, microbiology, antibiotic regimens, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among 136 patients, 76% were male, with a mean age of 69 ± 12 years. Renal insufficiency was observed in 32%, and 6% required renal replacement therapy. Based on the McCabe scale, 70% of patients had a rapidly or ultimately fatal disease. Polypharmacy was noted in 83%, and 60% of infections were moderate. Dalbavancin was primarily used as second-line therapy (92%). The cure rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 73.5–86.6%), achieved after a median of two doses. Patients receiving dalbavancin as first-line therapy had a cure rate of 86%, comparable to 80% in second-line therapy, with no significant differences. Surgical interventions were required in 72% of cases, with minor amputations performed in 40% of patients. Polymicrobial infections were common (55%), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 26% of cases. Adverse events occurred in 5% of patients. Chronic kidney disease was the sole independent risk factor for therapeutic failure (IRR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00, p = 0.045). Conclusions: Dalbavancin is effective and safe for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis, including in complex patients with resistant microorganisms.
- 23 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (19) , 6705
Open AccessReal-World Use of Dalbavancin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: PEDDAL Study
Background: Data on antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis are limited. This study aims to describe the real-world effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in treating deep diabetic foot infections. Methods: A retrospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in nine Spanish hospitals and one Irish hospital. Patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated with dalbavancin were included. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, microbiology, antibiotic regimens, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among 136 patients, 76% were male, with a mean age of 69 ± 12 years. Renal insufficiency was observed in 32%, and 6% required renal replacement therapy. Based on the McCabe scale, 70% of patients had a rapidly or ultimately fatal disease. Polypharmacy was noted in 83%, and 60% of infections were moderate. Dalbavancin was primarily used as second-line therapy (92%). The cure rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 73.5–86.6%), achieved after a median of two doses. Patients receiving dalbavancin as first-line therapy had a cure rate of 86%, comparable to 80% in second-line therapy, with no significant differences. Surgical interventions were required in 72% of cases, with minor amputations performed in 40% of patients. Polymicrobial infections were common (55%), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 26% of cases. Adverse events occurred in 5% of patients. Chronic kidney disease was the sole independent risk factor for therapeutic failure (IRR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00, p = 0.045). Conclusions: Dalbavancin is effective and safe for treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis, including in complex patients with resistant microorganisms.