Liang Lv

Liang Lv

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Liang Lv has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Arterial Enhancement Fraction-Spectral CT-Based Model as Part of Prediction Model in BRAFV600E-Positive Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

    by Bi Zhou, Liang Lv, Ya Zou, Zuhua Song, Jiayi Yu, Xiaodi Zhang, Dan Zhang

    Objectives: The BRAFV600E is the most common oncogene in thyroid cancer and is associated with the aggressiveness of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) and dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography (DLCT) parameters for predicting the BRAFV600E mutation in PTC. Methods: A total of 237 patients with PTC who underwent DLCT and BRAFV600E mutation detection (mutant group: n = 187; wild group: n = 50) were retrospectively reviewed. The receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the effectiveness of the prediction models based on the significantly different variables using logistic regression analysis. The nomogram of the prediction model with the highest AUC in the validation cohort was constructed. Results: The AUCs of the DLCT+ Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) and AEF + DLCT + HT prediction models were 0.901 and 0.896, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.801 and 0.853 in the validation cohort. The calibration curve revealed the good agreement between the prediction results and the actual observations using the AEF + DLCT + HT model. The DCA demonstrated that the model can provide net benefit for all threshold probabilities. Conclusions: As an effective and visually noninvasive prediction tool, the AEF + DLCT + HT-based nomogram presented satisfactory effectiveness in preoperatively predicting the BRAFV600E mutation in PTC.


  • Open Access

    Predictive Value of Arterial Enhancement Fraction Derived from Dual-Layer Spectral Computed Tomography for Thyroid Microcarcinoma

    by Yuwei Chen, Jiayi Yu, Liang Lv, Zuhua Song, Jie Huang, Bi Zhou, Xinghong Zou, Ya Zou, Dan Zhang

    Background/Objectives: Accurately distinguishing malignancy in thyroid micronodules (≤10 mm) is crucial for clinical management, yet it is challenging due to the limitations of conventional ultrasonography-guided biopsy. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DSCT)-derived arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) in diagnosing thyroid microcarcinomas. Methods: In the study, 321 pathologically confirmed thyroid micronodules (benign = 131, malignant = 190) from Chongqing General Hospital underwent preoperative DSCT. Quantitative parameters of DSCT, including the normalized iodine concentration (NIC), normalized effective atomic number (NZeff), and slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHU(40–100)), were assessed. Both single-energy CT (SECT)-derived AEF (AEFS) and DSCT-derived AEF (AEFD) were calculated. Conventional image features included microcalcifications and enhancement blurring. Correlation between AEFD and AEFS was determined using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Malignant micronodules exhibited significantly lower AEFD (0.958 vs. 1.259, p < 0.001) and AEFS (0.964 vs. 1.436, p < 0.001) versus benign nodules. Arterial phase parameters—APλHU(40–100), APNIC, APNZeff—differed significantly between groups (all p < 0.001), whereas venous phase parameters (VPλHU(40–100), VPNIC, VPNZeff) showed no differences (all p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that λHU(40–100) as an independent predictor of malignancy, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.600 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.437–0.823; p = 0.002) and an AUC of 0.752 (95% CI: 0.698–0.806). A significant positive correlation was identified between AEFD and AEFS (r = 0.710; p < 0.001). For diagnosing malignancy, AEFD demonstrated superior overall performance (AUC: 0.794; sensitivity: 70.5%; specificity: 81.7%; accuracy: 75.1%) to AEFS (0.753; 71.1%; 74.0%; 72.3%), APλHU(40–100) (0.752; 68.9%; 75.6%; 71.7%), and calcification (0.573; 21.6%; 92.4%; 50.5%). Clinically, AEFD reduced the unnecessary biopsy rate to 18.3%, preventing 107 procedures in our cohort. Conclusions: AEFD and AEFS demonstrated strong correlation and comparable diagnostic performance in the evaluation of thyroid micronodules. Furthermore, AEFD showed favorable diagnostic efficacy compared to both spectral parameters and conventional imaging feature. More importantly, the application of AEFD significantly reduced unnecessary biopsy rates, highlighting its clinical value in optimizing patient management.