James Won
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
James Won has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexis Z. Tomlinson
Data Science and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
1 shared publication - Amina Mshi Khan
Biomedical and Health Informatics
1 shared publication - Andi Fu
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
1 shared publication - Austin DeChalus
Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1 shared publication - Brianna Reed
Nursing and Clinical Care Services
1 shared publication - Brooke T. Luo
Clinical Futures, a Center of Emphasis in the CHOP Research Institute
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 September 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Patient Safety
- Vol. 21 (7Supp) , S89-S95
Clinician Communication and Patient Safety in Pediatrics: A Practical Application of Human-Centered Design for Problem Identification and Analysis
Background: We established a Patient Safety Learning Lab (AHRQ R18HS029473) to examine the sociotechnical system that drives interprofessional communication in pediatric inpatient settings in the context of evolving communication technologies, and to co-create and evaluate solutions with clinician end users. Here, we describe the use of human-centered design and system engineering processes for the Problem Analysis phase of this project. Methods: We applied the “Empathize” and “Define” steps of the design thinking process to our Problem Analysis. The goal of the Empathize step is to generate a comprehensive understanding of a problem(s) as experienced by the end user. We conducted interviews and observations with interprofessional clinicians from pediatric inpatient units in a single children’s hospital. We used other operational and clinical data to triangulate findings (clinician secure messaging metadata, survey data, and policies/procedures). In the “Define” step, we iteratively developed user-centered problem statements. Results: Data synthesized for the problem analysis included: interviews with 28 clinicians, 32 hours of unit observations; metadata for 433,432 secure messages; 155 free-text clinician survey responses; and 40 communication-related policies/procedures. The Problem Analysis revealed communication challenges in the following domains for clinicians providing frontline care (i.e., bedside nurses, residents, frontline fellows): (1) efficiently locating and contacting other members of the care team; (2) communicating urgency level of information; and (3) managing high volume of minimally informative messages. Conclusions: Practical application of human-centered design and systems thinking contributed to a more holistic understanding of communication challenges, and their patient safety implications, from the perspective of multiple end-user groups.
- 23 September 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Patient Safety
- Vol. 21 (7Supp) , S89-S95
Open AccessClinician Communication and Patient Safety in Pediatrics: A Practical Application of Human-Centered Design for Problem Identification and Analysis
Background: We established a Patient Safety Learning Lab (AHRQ R18HS029473) to examine the sociotechnical system that drives interprofessional communication in pediatric inpatient settings in the context of evolving communication technologies, and to co-create and evaluate solutions with clinician end users. Here, we describe the use of human-centered design and system engineering processes for the Problem Analysis phase of this project. Methods: We applied the “Empathize” and “Define” steps of the design thinking process to our Problem Analysis. The goal of the Empathize step is to generate a comprehensive understanding of a problem(s) as experienced by the end user. We conducted interviews and observations with interprofessional clinicians from pediatric inpatient units in a single children’s hospital. We used other operational and clinical data to triangulate findings (clinician secure messaging metadata, survey data, and policies/procedures). In the “Define” step, we iteratively developed user-centered problem statements. Results: Data synthesized for the problem analysis included: interviews with 28 clinicians, 32 hours of unit observations; metadata for 433,432 secure messages; 155 free-text clinician survey responses; and 40 communication-related policies/procedures. The Problem Analysis revealed communication challenges in the following domains for clinicians providing frontline care (i.e., bedside nurses, residents, frontline fellows): (1) efficiently locating and contacting other members of the care team; (2) communicating urgency level of information; and (3) managing high volume of minimally informative messages. Conclusions: Practical application of human-centered design and systems thinking contributed to a more holistic understanding of communication challenges, and their patient safety implications, from the perspective of multiple end-user groups.