Kangni Combey
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Kangni Combey has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Omer A. Elsayed
International University of Rabat
3 shared publications - Daniele Ragni
Delft University of Technology
2 shared publications Hajar Chouiyakh
2 shared publications- Khaoula Qaissi
International University of Rabat
2 shared publications - Andrea Magrini
Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
1 shared publication Faqir Mustapha
International University of Rabat
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Aerospace Science and Technology
- Vol. 178
Aeroacoustic analysis of tip-joined blade propeller
- 29 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Aerospace Science and Technology
- Vol. 178
Open AccessAeroacoustic analysis of tip-joined blade propeller
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2026
- Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in Journal of Aircraft
- Vol. 63 (3) , 959-975
Numerical Analysis of Multirotor Aerodynamic Interactions in Forward and Transition Flight
The growing demand for urban air mobility (UAM) has accelerated the development of hybrid/electric vertical takeoff and landing (H-/eVTOL) aircraft, which use distributed propulsion systems that generate complex aerodynamic interactions during forward and transition flight. This study investigates the aerodynamic interactions between two propellers arranged in a one-after-another (OAA) configuration, using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) simulations coupled with the [ ] shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model. The numerical setup was validated against experimental data for the isolated propeller across all investigated advance ratios, showing good agreement. Results reveal that, in forward flight, the rear propeller experiences up to 24% thrust and 20% power loss due to the disturbed airflow created by the wake of the front propeller. This is accompanied by only a 21% increase in axial velocity at the rear propeller location, indicating less effective energy transfer and lower thrust. Pressure coefficient analysis at the rear propeller midspan within the overlap region indicates increased flow separation and lower local loading. During transition, the overlap decreases with tilt, yet at 30° and 60°, the rear propeller still loses up to 11% thrust and 10% power due to slipstream deflection. As the propeller tilt angle increases, the thrust in the propeller axis direction also increases; however, this requires more power and generates a more complex slipstream. These findings provide valuable insights into wake interactions and their influence on rear propeller performance, offering practical design guidelines to improve the efficiency and reliability of UAM vehicles.
- 1 May 2026
- Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in Journal of Aircraft
- Vol. 63 (3) , 959-975
Top Cited PapersNumerical Analysis of Multirotor Aerodynamic Interactions in Forward and Transition Flight
The growing demand for urban air mobility (UAM) has accelerated the development of hybrid/electric vertical takeoff and landing (H-/eVTOL) aircraft, which use distributed propulsion systems that generate complex aerodynamic interactions during forward and transition flight. This study investigates the aerodynamic interactions between two propellers arranged in a one-after-another (OAA) configuration, using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) simulations coupled with the [ ] shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model. The numerical setup was validated against experimental data for the isolated propeller across all investigated advance ratios, showing good agreement. Results reveal that, in forward flight, the rear propeller experiences up to 24% thrust and 20% power loss due to the disturbed airflow created by the wake of the front propeller. This is accompanied by only a 21% increase in axial velocity at the rear propeller location, indicating less effective energy transfer and lower thrust. Pressure coefficient analysis at the rear propeller midspan within the overlap region indicates increased flow separation and lower local loading. During transition, the overlap decreases with tilt, yet at 30° and 60°, the rear propeller still loses up to 11% thrust and 10% power due to slipstream deflection. As the propeller tilt angle increases, the thrust in the propeller axis direction also increases; however, this requires more power and generates a more complex slipstream. These findings provide valuable insights into wake interactions and their influence on rear propeller performance, offering practical design guidelines to improve the efficiency and reliability of UAM vehicles.
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2026
- Published by AIP Publishing in Physics of Fluids
- Vol. 38 (1)
Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic interactions in multirotor aircraft for urban air mobility: A review
The rapid growth of urbanization and increasing road traffic congestion are straining ground transportation infrastructure for both conventional and emergency purposes, driving the need for alternative mobility solutions. urban air mobility (UAM) offers a promising pathway by deploying electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft to enable efficient and flexible aerial transport in dense urban environments. However, the successful integration of UAM into city airspace faces critical technical challenges, both at the vehicle and operational levels. In particular, complex aerodynamic and aeroacoustic interactions between closely spaced propellers significantly influence vehicle performance, energy efficiency, and public acceptance. This work presents a review of experimental and computational studies on propeller–propeller and propeller–wing interactions, highlighting the state-of-the-art methodologies and their application to multirotor eVTOL designs. Results indicate that distributed electric propulsion systems arranged in side-by-side configurations exhibit minimal thrust degradation, typically less than 3% compared to an isolated propeller. However, reductions in propeller spacing can induce unsteady blade loading and increase tonal noise levels by up to 10 dB. In contrast, one-after-another configurations may suffer thrust losses of up to 80%, due to slipstream ingestion by the rear propeller, with a lateral separation of at least twice the propeller radius required to recover performance within 4% of the isolated case. The review also addresses propeller–wing interactions that modify local pressure distributions and spanwise lift, particularly in wing-mounted distributed propulsion configurations. The insights provided establish a foundation for developing efficient, low-noise multirotor architectures for future UAM integration.
- 1 January 2026
- Published by AIP Publishing in Physics of Fluids
- Vol. 38 (1)
Top Cited PapersAerodynamic and aeroacoustic interactions in multirotor aircraft for urban air mobility: A review
The rapid growth of urbanization and increasing road traffic congestion are straining ground transportation infrastructure for both conventional and emergency purposes, driving the need for alternative mobility solutions. urban air mobility (UAM) offers a promising pathway by deploying electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft to enable efficient and flexible aerial transport in dense urban environments. However, the successful integration of UAM into city airspace faces critical technical challenges, both at the vehicle and operational levels. In particular, complex aerodynamic and aeroacoustic interactions between closely spaced propellers significantly influence vehicle performance, energy efficiency, and public acceptance. This work presents a review of experimental and computational studies on propeller–propeller and propeller–wing interactions, highlighting the state-of-the-art methodologies and their application to multirotor eVTOL designs. Results indicate that distributed electric propulsion systems arranged in side-by-side configurations exhibit minimal thrust degradation, typically less than 3% compared to an isolated propeller. However, reductions in propeller spacing can induce unsteady blade loading and increase tonal noise levels by up to 10 dB. In contrast, one-after-another configurations may suffer thrust losses of up to 80%, due to slipstream ingestion by the rear propeller, with a lateral separation of at least twice the propeller radius required to recover performance within 4% of the isolated case. The review also addresses propeller–wing interactions that modify local pressure distributions and spanwise lift, particularly in wing-mounted distributed propulsion configurations. The insights provided establish a foundation for developing efficient, low-noise multirotor architectures for future UAM integration.