Harry Obeng
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Harry Obeng has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adam W. Brothers
Department of Pharmacy, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
1 shared publication - Alison C. Tribble
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
1 shared publication - Ann L. Wirtz
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Mercy Kansas City , Kansas City, MO
1 shared publication - Brittany Rodriguez
Department of Pharmacy, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
1 shared publication - Daniel L. Riggsbee
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
1 shared publication - Debra Lynn Palazzi
Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 14 (10) , 1011
Establishing Priority Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in the US: Findings from a Delphi Consensus Study
Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat, with children at higher risk due to developmental differences in drug metabolism, limited treatment options and inappropriate antibiotic use. Pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) face implementation challenges, often relying on adult-based guidelines and limited pediatric-specific evidence. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the most critical areas for pediatric ASP intervention development through a structured, multi-round Delphi consensus process with experts in antimicrobial stewardship and infectious diseases. Method: A four-round modified Delphi process was conducted to identify and prioritize key pediatric ASP interventions. Experts in antimicrobial stewardship and infectious diseases were recruited through an existing clinical trial. Using an iterative survey and in-person discussions, experts provided input on priority areas, which were thematically grouped and refined across rounds. Structured feedback supported real-time refinement and consensus-building. Results: Twenty experts participated in the process, generating 25 priority items in Round 1 through open-ended responses. These were narrowed to seven key priorities through structured voting and discussion. The final items were clustered into three intersecting themes: Care Settings, Prescriptions, and Strategies. Care Settings focused on high-impact areas such as outpatient clinics and intensive care units, where misuse is common and/or care is complex. The prescriptions theme prioritized shorter durations and narrow-spectrum agents. The strategy theme highlighted the need for outcome-based metrics, improved diagnostic stewardship, and routine tracking of patient outcomes to guide and assess stewardship efforts. Conclusions: This expert consensus identified key priorities for pediatric ASPs, providing a foundation for future interventions. Findings can be used to inform policy and practice, improving the appropriate use of antimicrobials in pediatrics and combating AMR.
- 11 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 14 (10) , 1011
Open AccessEstablishing Priority Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in the US: Findings from a Delphi Consensus Study
Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat, with children at higher risk due to developmental differences in drug metabolism, limited treatment options and inappropriate antibiotic use. Pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) face implementation challenges, often relying on adult-based guidelines and limited pediatric-specific evidence. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the most critical areas for pediatric ASP intervention development through a structured, multi-round Delphi consensus process with experts in antimicrobial stewardship and infectious diseases. Method: A four-round modified Delphi process was conducted to identify and prioritize key pediatric ASP interventions. Experts in antimicrobial stewardship and infectious diseases were recruited through an existing clinical trial. Using an iterative survey and in-person discussions, experts provided input on priority areas, which were thematically grouped and refined across rounds. Structured feedback supported real-time refinement and consensus-building. Results: Twenty experts participated in the process, generating 25 priority items in Round 1 through open-ended responses. These were narrowed to seven key priorities through structured voting and discussion. The final items were clustered into three intersecting themes: Care Settings, Prescriptions, and Strategies. Care Settings focused on high-impact areas such as outpatient clinics and intensive care units, where misuse is common and/or care is complex. The prescriptions theme prioritized shorter durations and narrow-spectrum agents. The strategy theme highlighted the need for outcome-based metrics, improved diagnostic stewardship, and routine tracking of patient outcomes to guide and assess stewardship efforts. Conclusions: This expert consensus identified key priorities for pediatric ASPs, providing a foundation for future interventions. Findings can be used to inform policy and practice, improving the appropriate use of antimicrobials in pediatrics and combating AMR.