Niculina Nicoara
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Niculina Nicoara has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexander Olivier von Stauffenberg
“Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță” Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Cosmin Cristescu
“Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță” Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Delia Nicoara
Department of Quality Management, “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță” Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Ioan Constantin Pop
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Maximilian Vlad Muntean
Department of Plastic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta” Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication - Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu
Department of Surgical Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (19) , 7073
Family Physicians’ Perspectives on Personalized Cancer Prevention: Barriers, Training Needs, Quality Improvements and Opportunities for Collaborative Networks
Background/Objectives: Family physicians are key stakeholders in the implementation of cancer prevention strategies, including risk factor assessment, lifestyle counseling, and early detection. Despite this, integration of personalized prevention into routine practice remains limited. This study aimed to explore family physicians’ perspectives on barriers, training needs, and collaboration opportunities in cancer prevention. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an exploratory sequential design. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 12 family physicians from the North-West Region of Romania. Thematic analysis was employed to identify main challenges and opportunities. Findings informed the development of a structured online survey completed by 50 family physicians. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were applied to assess trends and subgroup differences. Results: Interviews and survey data revealed multiple barriers to cancer prevention in primary care: insufficient consultation time, limited access to diagnostic tools, administrative workload, and low patient health literacy. Physicians reported moderate familiarity with personalized prevention but expressed strong interest in further training, particularly through flexible and interactive learning formats. Collaboration with cancer centers was considered suboptimal; participants emphasized the need for streamlined referral pathways and improved communication. Conclusions: The study highlights systemic and educational gaps affecting cancer prevention efforts in family medicine. Tailored training programs, digital integration with cancer centers, and targeted policy adjustments are needed to enhance prevention capacity within primary care.
- 7 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (19) , 7073
Open AccessFamily Physicians’ Perspectives on Personalized Cancer Prevention: Barriers, Training Needs, Quality Improvements and Opportunities for Collaborative Networks
Background/Objectives: Family physicians are key stakeholders in the implementation of cancer prevention strategies, including risk factor assessment, lifestyle counseling, and early detection. Despite this, integration of personalized prevention into routine practice remains limited. This study aimed to explore family physicians’ perspectives on barriers, training needs, and collaboration opportunities in cancer prevention. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an exploratory sequential design. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 12 family physicians from the North-West Region of Romania. Thematic analysis was employed to identify main challenges and opportunities. Findings informed the development of a structured online survey completed by 50 family physicians. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were applied to assess trends and subgroup differences. Results: Interviews and survey data revealed multiple barriers to cancer prevention in primary care: insufficient consultation time, limited access to diagnostic tools, administrative workload, and low patient health literacy. Physicians reported moderate familiarity with personalized prevention but expressed strong interest in further training, particularly through flexible and interactive learning formats. Collaboration with cancer centers was considered suboptimal; participants emphasized the need for streamlined referral pathways and improved communication. Conclusions: The study highlights systemic and educational gaps affecting cancer prevention efforts in family medicine. Tailored training programs, digital integration with cancer centers, and targeted policy adjustments are needed to enhance prevention capacity within primary care.