Younès Youssfi
Research Subjects
Younès Youssfi has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Alain Cariou
Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center , 51 Rue Leblanc, Paris 75015
1 shared publicationFlorence Dumas
Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center , 51 Rue Leblanc, Paris 75015
1 shared publication- Frankie Beganton
Inserm, PARCC, F-75015 (M.-C.P., F.B., E.M., X.J., J.-P.E., A. Cariou), Sudden Death Expertise Centre, Université Paris Cité, France
1 shared publication - Jean-Philippe Empana
Inserm, PARCC, F-75015 (M.-C.P., F.B., E.M., X.J., J.-P.E., A. Cariou), Sudden Death Expertise Centre, Université Paris Cité, France
1 shared publication Lucie Fanet
Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center , 51 Rue Leblanc, Paris 75015
1 shared publicationRichard Chocron
Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center , 51 Rue Leblanc, Paris 75015
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 30 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
- Vol. 12 (2) , 200-209
One year healthcare consumption prior to sudden cardiac death
Aims: Identifying individuals at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is key, and knowledge on health care consumption prior to the event may be relevant to address this challenge. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare consumption patterns in the year preceding SCD. Methods and results: SCD cases were collected from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Centre (SDEC) from 2011 to 2020. Using electronic health records from the French National Health Insurance System, all medical interactions were analysed in the year prior to SCD occurrence. To contextualize our findings, the SDEC population was compared with national-level data from the French population, categorized as either above or below the population average, across 2 dimensions: number of hospital diagnoses (primary diagnosis or emergency room visit) and outpatient visits (general practitioner or cardiologist visit). 21 912 SCD were included in the study. Compared with the general population, three distinct patterns of healthcare consumption were identified. The low-interaction group (14%) had minimal healthcare contact, with 3.8 times fewer outpatient and 13.5 times fewer inpatient visits. The intermediate group (40%) showed modest engagement, recording 1.5 times fewer outpatient visits and 5.8 times more inpatient visits. The high-interaction group (46%) had 2.7 times more outpatient and 7.9 times more inpatient visits compared with the general population. Conclusion: This study highlights significant variability in healthcare use during the year preceding SCD. Nearly half of patients had frequent healthcare contacts, suggesting opportunities for earlier identification and prevention.
- 30 September 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
- Vol. 12 (2) , 200-209
One year healthcare consumption prior to sudden cardiac death
Aims: Identifying individuals at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is key, and knowledge on health care consumption prior to the event may be relevant to address this challenge. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare consumption patterns in the year preceding SCD. Methods and results: SCD cases were collected from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Centre (SDEC) from 2011 to 2020. Using electronic health records from the French National Health Insurance System, all medical interactions were analysed in the year prior to SCD occurrence. To contextualize our findings, the SDEC population was compared with national-level data from the French population, categorized as either above or below the population average, across 2 dimensions: number of hospital diagnoses (primary diagnosis or emergency room visit) and outpatient visits (general practitioner or cardiologist visit). 21 912 SCD were included in the study. Compared with the general population, three distinct patterns of healthcare consumption were identified. The low-interaction group (14%) had minimal healthcare contact, with 3.8 times fewer outpatient and 13.5 times fewer inpatient visits. The intermediate group (40%) showed modest engagement, recording 1.5 times fewer outpatient visits and 5.8 times more inpatient visits. The high-interaction group (46%) had 2.7 times more outpatient and 7.9 times more inpatient visits compared with the general population. Conclusion: This study highlights significant variability in healthcare use during the year preceding SCD. Nearly half of patients had frequent healthcare contacts, suggesting opportunities for earlier identification and prevention.