Jan Voets
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jan Voets has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hasan Tercan
University of Wuppertal
2 shared publications - Tobias Meisen
University of Wuppertal
2 shared publications - Antonin Königsfeld
Institute for Technologies and Management of Digital Transformation (TMDT) University of Wuppertal Rainer-Gruenter-Straße 21 42119 2026 Wuppertal Germany Preprint, February
1 shared publication - Cemal Esen
Applied Laser Technologies, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
1 shared publication - Yannik Hahn
Institute for Technologies and Management of Digital Transformation, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (3) , 1568
A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Machine Learning Methods for Process Optimization and Control in Laser Welding
Laser welding is widely used in complex manufacturing processes and valued for its reliability, flexibility, and high energy density. However, achieving the desired weld quality requires the detection and, ideally, the prevention of defects. Besides other methods, machine learning (ML) has been integrated into laser welding with the primary goal of process optimization and quality improvement, for example, by enabling process adaptation before or during welding to reduce defects. This survey systematically reviews publications from 2015 to 2025 that integrate machine learning and deep learning methods into laser welding optimization or adaptation processes. An extensive analysis identifies which parts of the process and for what purposes ML methods are researched and implemented and how they are evaluated, as well as the sensors, lasers, and materials involved. Furthermore, the findings are analyzed and organized into taxonomies that define overarching meta-categories into which existing approaches can be classified and contextualized. The results reveal that various ML approaches are applied for tasks, such as surrogate modeling, process planning, direct control, and virtual sensing and monitoring. Although many different control parameters and optimization targets are considered, laser power and welding speed dominate as the most frequently adjusted parameters, while penetration depth and weld geometry-related properties are the most common optimization targets. Finally, the survey identifies major challenges, including the lack of benchmarking datasets, standardized evaluation protocols, and interpretable models.
- 4 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (3) , 1568
Open AccessA Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Machine Learning Methods for Process Optimization and Control in Laser Welding
Laser welding is widely used in complex manufacturing processes and valued for its reliability, flexibility, and high energy density. However, achieving the desired weld quality requires the detection and, ideally, the prevention of defects. Besides other methods, machine learning (ML) has been integrated into laser welding with the primary goal of process optimization and quality improvement, for example, by enabling process adaptation before or during welding to reduce defects. This survey systematically reviews publications from 2015 to 2025 that integrate machine learning and deep learning methods into laser welding optimization or adaptation processes. An extensive analysis identifies which parts of the process and for what purposes ML methods are researched and implemented and how they are evaluated, as well as the sensors, lasers, and materials involved. Furthermore, the findings are analyzed and organized into taxonomies that define overarching meta-categories into which existing approaches can be classified and contextualized. The results reveal that various ML approaches are applied for tasks, such as surrogate modeling, process planning, direct control, and virtual sensing and monitoring. Although many different control parameters and optimization targets are considered, laser power and welding speed dominate as the most frequently adjusted parameters, while penetration depth and weld geometry-related properties are the most common optimization targets. Finally, the survey identifies major challenges, including the lack of benchmarking datasets, standardized evaluation protocols, and interpretable models.
- Open Access
- 10 November 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 5699-5706
Out of Distribution Detection for Efficient Continual Learning in Quality Prediction for Arc Welding
- 10 November 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 5699-5706
Open AccessOut of Distribution Detection for Efficient Continual Learning in Quality Prediction for Arc Welding