Xiao Jia
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Xiao Jia has a total of 2 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haotian Xu
Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication Wenqin Shen
Peking University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 8 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 147-168
Structure, Boundary, and Connection of Space: Higher Education System from the Perspective of Geography
- 8 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 147-168
Structure, Boundary, and Connection of Space: Higher Education System from the Perspective of Geography
- Open Access
- 10 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (20) , 8984
Promoting Sustainable Development of Inter-Regional Higher Education Through a Rationality-Based Evaluation of Development Gaps—Evidence from China
How to keep inter-regional gaps in higher-education development within a reasonable range is a shared global challenge, yet much of the literature still treats zero gap as the benchmark. Grounded in the education-led development perspective, we posit that a gap is “reasonable” when education disparities are smaller than contemporaneous economic disparities. Based on this concept, this study develops a Development Equilibrium Index (DEI) framework. Using panel data for 31 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2020, we find the following: (i) N-DEI is positive in most years, indicating that, overall, education gaps are smaller than economic gaps—consistent with higher education’s leading role in compressing economic gaps and supporting sustainability; (ii) At the provincial level, only 4 of 31 provinces (12.9%) show negative P-DEI, while the vast majority are positive, suggesting more supportive conditions to sustainable development. Furthermore, a median-based quadrant analysis for 2020 groups the 31 provinces into seven descriptive types, helping to interpret the variations in P-DEI signs and magnitudes and to inform targeted policy recommendations. The DEI thus reframes assessment from “narrowing gaps per se” to the goal of keeping education gaps below economic ones, providing a concise diagnostic tool for planning cohesive, resilient higher-education systems.
- 10 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (20) , 8984
Open AccessPromoting Sustainable Development of Inter-Regional Higher Education Through a Rationality-Based Evaluation of Development Gaps—Evidence from China
How to keep inter-regional gaps in higher-education development within a reasonable range is a shared global challenge, yet much of the literature still treats zero gap as the benchmark. Grounded in the education-led development perspective, we posit that a gap is “reasonable” when education disparities are smaller than contemporaneous economic disparities. Based on this concept, this study develops a Development Equilibrium Index (DEI) framework. Using panel data for 31 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2020, we find the following: (i) N-DEI is positive in most years, indicating that, overall, education gaps are smaller than economic gaps—consistent with higher education’s leading role in compressing economic gaps and supporting sustainability; (ii) At the provincial level, only 4 of 31 provinces (12.9%) show negative P-DEI, while the vast majority are positive, suggesting more supportive conditions to sustainable development. Furthermore, a median-based quadrant analysis for 2020 groups the 31 provinces into seven descriptive types, helping to interpret the variations in P-DEI signs and magnitudes and to inform targeted policy recommendations. The DEI thus reframes assessment from “narrowing gaps per se” to the goal of keeping education gaps below economic ones, providing a concise diagnostic tool for planning cohesive, resilient higher-education systems.