Assel Kabibulatova
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Assel Kabibulatova has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Malin Båtsman
Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Mehzabin Kazi
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Peter Berglund
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Sara Strandberg
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Ulrika Ottander
Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 15 (20) , 2560
Imaging-Based Pre-Operative Differentiation of Ovarian Tumours—A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of imaging-based biomarkers from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prediction of malignant and borderline malignant ovarian tumours. Methods: 195 consecutive patients with suspected primary epithelial ovarian cancer were included from the retrospective “Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynaecological Cancer” (PRODIGYN) study. The radiological stage, according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics system (rFIGO), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS-MRI) score, and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) were investigated for prediction of ovarian malignancy, with histopathology as reference. The same imaging biomarkers were applied to the borderline tumour cohort (n = 33) to predict malignant/adverse features, such as micro-invasion. Results: The rFIGO stage demonstrated high accuracy for ovarian malignancy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97–0.99). On lesion level, the sensitivity and specificity of the O-RADS-MRI score to predict ovarian malignancy, after adjusting for correlated data structure, was 1 (CI: 0.96–1) and 0.82 (CI: 0.70–0.90), respectively. The performance of ADCmean to predict ovarian malignancy on lesion level was moderately high, with AUC = 0.78 (95% CI 0.68, 0.88). Discrimination of adverse features in borderline tumours was not improved. Conclusions: rFIGO and O-RADS-MRI showed excellent performance and outperformed ADCmean as predictive tools for ovarian malignancy but could not predict adverse features in borderline tumours.
- 11 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 15 (20) , 2560
Open AccessImaging-Based Pre-Operative Differentiation of Ovarian Tumours—A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of imaging-based biomarkers from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prediction of malignant and borderline malignant ovarian tumours. Methods: 195 consecutive patients with suspected primary epithelial ovarian cancer were included from the retrospective “Prognostic and Diagnostic Added Value of Medical Imaging in Staging and Treatment Planning of Gynaecological Cancer” (PRODIGYN) study. The radiological stage, according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics system (rFIGO), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS-MRI) score, and the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) were investigated for prediction of ovarian malignancy, with histopathology as reference. The same imaging biomarkers were applied to the borderline tumour cohort (n = 33) to predict malignant/adverse features, such as micro-invasion. Results: The rFIGO stage demonstrated high accuracy for ovarian malignancy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.97–0.99). On lesion level, the sensitivity and specificity of the O-RADS-MRI score to predict ovarian malignancy, after adjusting for correlated data structure, was 1 (CI: 0.96–1) and 0.82 (CI: 0.70–0.90), respectively. The performance of ADCmean to predict ovarian malignancy on lesion level was moderately high, with AUC = 0.78 (95% CI 0.68, 0.88). Discrimination of adverse features in borderline tumours was not improved. Conclusions: rFIGO and O-RADS-MRI showed excellent performance and outperformed ADCmean as predictive tools for ovarian malignancy but could not predict adverse features in borderline tumours.