Livia Cristina Dias
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Livia Cristina Dias has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daniela Vieira Buchaim
Professional Graduate Program in Clinical Research, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil, Brazil
2 shared publications - Rogerio Leone Buchaim
Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB/USP), University of São Paulo, Bauru 17012-901, Brazil
2 shared publications - Alexandre José Jacintho
Centro universitário de Adamantina - FAI
1 shared publication - Ana Carolina Cestari Bighetti
Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB), University of São Paulo (USP), Bauru 17012-901, SP, Brazil
1 shared publication - Benedito Barraviera
São Paulo State University, Brazil; São Paulo State University, Brazil; São Paulo State University, Brazil
1 shared publication - Camila Pascoal Correia dos Santos
Graduate Program in Applied Dental Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru 17012-901, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 16 (6) , 783
Biological Interactions in Rat Tibial Osteogenesis: Micro-CT, Histomorphometric, and Histological Analyses of Bioglass, Fibrin Biopolymer, and Photobiomodulation
The study evaluated bone repair in tibial defects of Wistar rats treated with 45S5 bioactive glass, either alone or combined with lyophilized heterologous fibrin biopolymer (HFB) and/or photobiomodulation therapy (PBM). Thirty-five animals were randomly assigned to five groups: control (CG), Bioactive glass (BG), Bioactive glass + HFB (BFG), Bioactive glass + PBM (BPG), and Bioactive glass + HFB + PBM (BFPG). After 42 days, the samples were analyzed by micro-computed tomography, histology (Hematoxylin–Eosin, Masson’s Trichrome, and Picrosirius Red), and histomorphometry. Histological and micro-CT findings demonstrated improved defect closure and better matrix organization in the BG and BFG groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed significant differences among the groups (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), with the BG group showing the highest percentage of new bone formation (40.35 ± 4.14%), significantly higher than the BPG and BFPG groups. The addition of HFB did not impair bone repair and yielded intermediate results, whereas PBM did not demonstrate a positive effect on bone regeneration at the 42-day time point under the parameters used in this study. It can be concluded that bioactive glass, especially when used alone or in combination with heterologous fibrin biopolymer, promoted superior bone regeneration, while its association with photobiomodulation did not demonstrate additional benefit at 42 days.
- 26 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 16 (6) , 783
Open AccessBiological Interactions in Rat Tibial Osteogenesis: Micro-CT, Histomorphometric, and Histological Analyses of Bioglass, Fibrin Biopolymer, and Photobiomodulation
The study evaluated bone repair in tibial defects of Wistar rats treated with 45S5 bioactive glass, either alone or combined with lyophilized heterologous fibrin biopolymer (HFB) and/or photobiomodulation therapy (PBM). Thirty-five animals were randomly assigned to five groups: control (CG), Bioactive glass (BG), Bioactive glass + HFB (BFG), Bioactive glass + PBM (BPG), and Bioactive glass + HFB + PBM (BFPG). After 42 days, the samples were analyzed by micro-computed tomography, histology (Hematoxylin–Eosin, Masson’s Trichrome, and Picrosirius Red), and histomorphometry. Histological and micro-CT findings demonstrated improved defect closure and better matrix organization in the BG and BFG groups. Histomorphometric analysis revealed significant differences among the groups (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), with the BG group showing the highest percentage of new bone formation (40.35 ± 4.14%), significantly higher than the BPG and BFPG groups. The addition of HFB did not impair bone repair and yielded intermediate results, whereas PBM did not demonstrate a positive effect on bone regeneration at the 42-day time point under the parameters used in this study. It can be concluded that bioactive glass, especially when used alone or in combination with heterologous fibrin biopolymer, promoted superior bone regeneration, while its association with photobiomodulation did not demonstrate additional benefit at 42 days.
- Open Access
- 13 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (10) , 2490
Exploring Cannabidiol’s Role in Regenerative Medicine: Focus on Neural and Skeletal Tissues
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychotropic compound found in plants of the Cannabis genus, extensively studied for its therapeutic potential. Research has shown that CBD possesses anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and regenerative properties, and may contribute to the recovery of neural and bone tissues. In light of the aging population and the resulting rise in neurodegenerative and osteodegenerative conditions, exploring novel therapeutic strategies that promote cellular regeneration is increasingly important. This review aims to compile and critically analyze key studies published in recent decades regarding the effects of CBD on the regeneration of the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as bone tissue. Findings from in vivo studies indicate that CBD can attenuate inflammatory responses, inhibit oxidative stress, and modulate cellular pathways involved in tissue repair, thereby supporting neuronal and bone regeneration. Moreover, evidence suggests that CBD may protect cells from structural damage, enhancing the functional recovery of affected tissues. Despite scientific advances highlighting cannabidiol as a promising agent for bone and nerve regeneration, its therapeutic application still faces significant limitations. The primary challenge lies in the lack of robust clinical trials in humans, as most existing evidence is derived from in vitro and in vivo studies, making it difficult to confirm its efficacy and safety in clinical contexts. Additionally, CBD’s low bioavailability—due to first-pass hepatic metabolism—hinders dose standardization and reduces the predictability of therapeutic outcomes. Compounding these issues are regulatory constraints and the persistent social stigma surrounding cannabis-derived compounds, which further impede their integration and acceptance in regenerative medicine. Therefore, future research is essential to validate the therapeutic benefits of CBD and to establish its clinical applicability in treating neurological and bone disorders.
- 13 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 13 (10) , 2490
Open AccessExploring Cannabidiol’s Role in Regenerative Medicine: Focus on Neural and Skeletal Tissues
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychotropic compound found in plants of the Cannabis genus, extensively studied for its therapeutic potential. Research has shown that CBD possesses anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and regenerative properties, and may contribute to the recovery of neural and bone tissues. In light of the aging population and the resulting rise in neurodegenerative and osteodegenerative conditions, exploring novel therapeutic strategies that promote cellular regeneration is increasingly important. This review aims to compile and critically analyze key studies published in recent decades regarding the effects of CBD on the regeneration of the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as bone tissue. Findings from in vivo studies indicate that CBD can attenuate inflammatory responses, inhibit oxidative stress, and modulate cellular pathways involved in tissue repair, thereby supporting neuronal and bone regeneration. Moreover, evidence suggests that CBD may protect cells from structural damage, enhancing the functional recovery of affected tissues. Despite scientific advances highlighting cannabidiol as a promising agent for bone and nerve regeneration, its therapeutic application still faces significant limitations. The primary challenge lies in the lack of robust clinical trials in humans, as most existing evidence is derived from in vitro and in vivo studies, making it difficult to confirm its efficacy and safety in clinical contexts. Additionally, CBD’s low bioavailability—due to first-pass hepatic metabolism—hinders dose standardization and reduces the predictability of therapeutic outcomes. Compounding these issues are regulatory constraints and the persistent social stigma surrounding cannabis-derived compounds, which further impede their integration and acceptance in regenerative medicine. Therefore, future research is essential to validate the therapeutic benefits of CBD and to establish its clinical applicability in treating neurological and bone disorders.