Jennifer Ding
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Jennifer Ding has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ben Burtenshaw2 shared publications
- Cailean Osborne
Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
2 shared publications Johan Linaker
1 shared publication- Johan Linåker
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
A Cartography of Open Collaboration in Open Source AI: Mapping Practices, Motivations, and Governance in 14 Open Large Language Model Projects
The proliferation of open large language models (LLMs) is fostering a vibrant ecosystem in artificial intelligence (AI). However, the methods of collaboration used to develop open LLMs, both before and after their public release, have not yet been systematically studied, limiting our understanding of how open LLM projects are initiated, organised, and governed, as well as the opportunities to further foster this ecosystem. We address this gap through an exploratory analysis of open collaboration throughout the development and reuse lifecycle of open LLMs, drawing on semi-structured interviews with the developers of 14 diverse open LLM projects. These collaborations span multiple artefact domains---including models, data, software, evaluation, compute, and community engagement---each enabling distinct forms of participation and involving different stakeholders that evolves across the LLM development lifecycle, shifting from concentrated, selective engagement in the early stages to broader, distributed participation after model release. The open LLM developers are motivated by a variety of social, economic, and technological motivations, ranging from democratising access to AI and promoting open science to building regional ecosystems and expanding language representation.These dynamics are coordinated through a range of governance structures, typically formal and professionalised to varying degrees, including centralised company-led efforts to decentralised grassroots initiatives. We synthesise our findings in a conceptual model of open collaboration in open LLM ecosystems, provide recommendations for practice, and conclude that openness in open source AI is not a uniform property but an emergent outcome of how collaboration is organised across interconnected artefact domains, lifecycle stages, and institutional contexts.
- 5 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Open AccessA Cartography of Open Collaboration in Open Source AI: Mapping Practices, Motivations, and Governance in 14 Open Large Language Model Projects
The proliferation of open large language models (LLMs) is fostering a vibrant ecosystem in artificial intelligence (AI). However, the methods of collaboration used to develop open LLMs, both before and after their public release, have not yet been systematically studied, limiting our understanding of how open LLM projects are initiated, organised, and governed, as well as the opportunities to further foster this ecosystem. We address this gap through an exploratory analysis of open collaboration throughout the development and reuse lifecycle of open LLMs, drawing on semi-structured interviews with the developers of 14 diverse open LLM projects. These collaborations span multiple artefact domains---including models, data, software, evaluation, compute, and community engagement---each enabling distinct forms of participation and involving different stakeholders that evolves across the LLM development lifecycle, shifting from concentrated, selective engagement in the early stages to broader, distributed participation after model release. The open LLM developers are motivated by a variety of social, economic, and technological motivations, ranging from democratising access to AI and promoting open science to building regional ecosystems and expanding language representation.These dynamics are coordinated through a range of governance structures, typically formal and professionalised to varying degrees, including centralised company-led efforts to decentralised grassroots initiatives. We synthesise our findings in a conceptual model of open collaboration in open LLM ecosystems, provide recommendations for practice, and conclude that openness in open source AI is not a uniform property but an emergent outcome of how collaboration is organised across interconnected artefact domains, lifecycle stages, and institutional contexts.
- Open Access
A Cartography of Open Collaboration in Open Source AI: Mapping Practices, Motivations, and Governance in 14 Open Large Language Model Projects
The proliferation of open large language models (LLMs) is fostering a vibrant ecosystem of research and innovation in artificial intelligence (AI). However, the methods of collaboration used to develop open LLMs both before and after their public release have not yet been comprehensively studied, limiting our understanding of how open LLM projects are initiated, organized, and governed as well as what opportunities there are to foster this ecosystem even further. We address this gap through an exploratory analysis of open collaboration throughout the development and reuse lifecycle of open LLMs, drawing on semi-structured interviews with the developers of 14 open LLMs from grassroots projects, research institutes, startups, and Big Tech companies in North America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. We make three key contributions to research and practice. First, collaboration in open LLM projects extends far beyond the LLMs themselves, encompassing datasets, benchmarks, open source frameworks, leaderboards, knowledge sharing and discussion forums, and compute partnerships, among others. Second, open LLM developers have a variety of social, economic, and technological motivations, from democratizing AI access and promoting open science to building regional ecosystems and expanding language representation. Third, the sampled open LLM projects exhibit five distinct organizational models, ranging from single company projects to non-profit-sponsored grassroots projects, which vary in their centralization of control and community engagement strategies used throughout the open LLM lifecycle. We conclude with practical recommendations for stakeholders seeking to support the global community building a more open future for AI.
Open AccessA Cartography of Open Collaboration in Open Source AI: Mapping Practices, Motivations, and Governance in 14 Open Large Language Model Projects
The proliferation of open large language models (LLMs) is fostering a vibrant ecosystem of research and innovation in artificial intelligence (AI). However, the methods of collaboration used to develop open LLMs both before and after their public release have not yet been comprehensively studied, limiting our understanding of how open LLM projects are initiated, organized, and governed as well as what opportunities there are to foster this ecosystem even further. We address this gap through an exploratory analysis of open collaboration throughout the development and reuse lifecycle of open LLMs, drawing on semi-structured interviews with the developers of 14 open LLMs from grassroots projects, research institutes, startups, and Big Tech companies in North America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. We make three key contributions to research and practice. First, collaboration in open LLM projects extends far beyond the LLMs themselves, encompassing datasets, benchmarks, open source frameworks, leaderboards, knowledge sharing and discussion forums, and compute partnerships, among others. Second, open LLM developers have a variety of social, economic, and technological motivations, from democratizing AI access and promoting open science to building regional ecosystems and expanding language representation. Third, the sampled open LLM projects exhibit five distinct organizational models, ranging from single company projects to non-profit-sponsored grassroots projects, which vary in their centralization of control and community engagement strategies used throughout the open LLM lifecycle. We conclude with practical recommendations for stakeholders seeking to support the global community building a more open future for AI.