Danielle VandeZande
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Danielle VandeZande has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aisha Lofters
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication - Ashante Lakey
Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
1 shared publication - Clare Cruickshank
Patient and Community Partner, Canada
1 shared publication - Emily Peterson
Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
1 shared publication - Etienne Oshinowo
Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
1 shared publication - Jennifer Michelle Jones
Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 32 (10) , 580
Supportive Care Needs of Patients with Breast Cancer Who Self-Identify as Black: An Integrative Review
Black-identifying patients face many barriers to the receipt of equitable breast cancer care; however, little is currently known about the unique needs of this patient population, particularly in Canada. To address this gap, we identified and thematically grouped constructs from the published literature reporting on the needs of Black-identifying patients with breast cancer and compared these findings to a list generated through a virtual nominal consensus group (NG) attended by Canadian patients with breast cancer who self-identified as Black (n = 3). A scoping review was undertaken, and relevant citations published from database inception until January 2025 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. The literature review yielded 34 articles from the United States and identified 15 constructs consistent with the NG, which spanned the cancer continuum from screening to survivorship. The NG identified four additional constructs that were not found in the literature: advocacy and outreach, communication and health literacy, comorbidities and personalized care, and end-of-life care. The final set of constructs was then validated and prioritized by an expert panel consisting of patients with lived experience and relevant community partner organizations (n = 9) to drive future research, advocacy, and policy work. Patient navigation was identified as the top need, with financial support, access to culturally tailored information and resources, culturally relevant care, racialized data for treatment decision-making, and emotional support identified as high-priority needs.
- 18 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 32 (10) , 580
Open AccessSupportive Care Needs of Patients with Breast Cancer Who Self-Identify as Black: An Integrative Review
Black-identifying patients face many barriers to the receipt of equitable breast cancer care; however, little is currently known about the unique needs of this patient population, particularly in Canada. To address this gap, we identified and thematically grouped constructs from the published literature reporting on the needs of Black-identifying patients with breast cancer and compared these findings to a list generated through a virtual nominal consensus group (NG) attended by Canadian patients with breast cancer who self-identified as Black (n = 3). A scoping review was undertaken, and relevant citations published from database inception until January 2025 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. The literature review yielded 34 articles from the United States and identified 15 constructs consistent with the NG, which spanned the cancer continuum from screening to survivorship. The NG identified four additional constructs that were not found in the literature: advocacy and outreach, communication and health literacy, comorbidities and personalized care, and end-of-life care. The final set of constructs was then validated and prioritized by an expert panel consisting of patients with lived experience and relevant community partner organizations (n = 9) to drive future research, advocacy, and policy work. Patient navigation was identified as the top need, with financial support, access to culturally tailored information and resources, culturally relevant care, racialized data for treatment decision-making, and emotional support identified as high-priority needs.