Asfiya Naureen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Asfiya Naureen has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adeeba Sajid
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Anam Hashmi
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Ayesha Deed
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication - Hamad Hejazi
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals Trust, Newcastle NE1 4LP, UK
1 shared publication - Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro Junior
Department of Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
1 shared publication - Raiyan Ehtesham Ahmed Sharieff
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (20) , 7430
Suction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) for Emergency Airway Management: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Implementation
Background: Emergency airway management is a crucial and complex procedure frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). Airway contamination usually caused by blood, secretions, and emesis impairs ventilation, reduces successful intubation, and increases the complication rates, leading to difficult laryngoscopy, delayed intubation, and increased mortality rates. One technique employed to decontaminate these airways when standard approaches fail is Suction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Science direct databases following a specific search strategy. All search results were screened in a two-stage process (title–abstract and full-text screening) in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Data from finalized articles were extracted using a standardized excel file developed a priori. Lastly, quality and risk of bias were assessed using appropriate tools according to respective study designs, and data were narratively synthesized. Results: A total of 224 records were identified. Upon screening, seven studies were included consisting of five simulation-based studies and two clinical case reports. Simulation studies reported that SALAD training significantly improved first-pass intubation success (53.7–90.2%), reduced time to intubation (up to 30 s), and enhanced airway visualization. Clinical cases further reported successful first-pass intubation in patients with massive airway contamination without complications. Overall, across both study types, the SALAD technique improved airway management performance, provider confidence, and airway contamination control compared to standard suction techniques. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the benefits of the SALAD technique by enhancing airway visualization, reinforcing it as a significant tool for contaminated airway management. Trainees who underwent SALAD training demonstrated improved first-pass intubation success, reduced intubation time, and increased operator confidence. While data from the included studies seems promising, most studies are small simulation-based studies with limited clinical outcome data. Given its clinical relevance and educational value, future studies must prioritize high-quality research in clinical environments to establish SALAD’s efficacy and to define its role in integration into prehospital protocols.
- 21 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (20) , 7430
Open AccessSuction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) for Emergency Airway Management: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Implementation
Background: Emergency airway management is a crucial and complex procedure frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). Airway contamination usually caused by blood, secretions, and emesis impairs ventilation, reduces successful intubation, and increases the complication rates, leading to difficult laryngoscopy, delayed intubation, and increased mortality rates. One technique employed to decontaminate these airways when standard approaches fail is Suction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Science direct databases following a specific search strategy. All search results were screened in a two-stage process (title–abstract and full-text screening) in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Data from finalized articles were extracted using a standardized excel file developed a priori. Lastly, quality and risk of bias were assessed using appropriate tools according to respective study designs, and data were narratively synthesized. Results: A total of 224 records were identified. Upon screening, seven studies were included consisting of five simulation-based studies and two clinical case reports. Simulation studies reported that SALAD training significantly improved first-pass intubation success (53.7–90.2%), reduced time to intubation (up to 30 s), and enhanced airway visualization. Clinical cases further reported successful first-pass intubation in patients with massive airway contamination without complications. Overall, across both study types, the SALAD technique improved airway management performance, provider confidence, and airway contamination control compared to standard suction techniques. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the benefits of the SALAD technique by enhancing airway visualization, reinforcing it as a significant tool for contaminated airway management. Trainees who underwent SALAD training demonstrated improved first-pass intubation success, reduced intubation time, and increased operator confidence. While data from the included studies seems promising, most studies are small simulation-based studies with limited clinical outcome data. Given its clinical relevance and educational value, future studies must prioritize high-quality research in clinical environments to establish SALAD’s efficacy and to define its role in integration into prehospital protocols.