Mariah Thokozile Motsoeneng
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Mariah Thokozile Motsoeneng has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alfred Thaga Kgopa
University of South Africa
2 shared publications - Ignitia Motjolopane
University of the Witwatersrand
2 shared publications - Mmatshuene Anna Segooa
Tshwane University of Technology
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 378-389
Themes shaping Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Readiness in South Africa’s Energy Supply Chain
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 378-389
Themes shaping Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Readiness in South Africa’s Energy Supply Chain
- Open Access
- 22 September 2025
- Published by Asosiasi Doktor Sistem Informasi Indonesia in Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
- Vol. 7 (3) , 3005-3024
Robotic Process Automation Readiness Barriers and Enablers in South Africa’s Energy Supply Chain
South Africa’s energy industry faces ongoing challenges including power shortages, ageing infrastructure, and supply chain inefficiencies, while, limited empirical evidence exists on how organisations in this industry prepare for Robotics Process Automation (RPA) adoption. This study examines the RPA readiness barriers and enablers within the supply chain of South Africa’s energy industry. The research adopts a qualitative design grounded in the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework and the Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement (ADKAR) change management model to connect technological capability with individual and organisational readiness for change. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 18 professionals representing eight stakeholder groups, including supply chain managers, IT specialists, process improvement leads, and employees affected by automation. Four key readiness barriers emerged: readiness gaps (61 mentions), organisational misalignment (158), infrastructure strain (83), and job security and resistance (60). Corresponding enablers included leadership accountability, RPA governance and alignment frameworks, readiness checklists, structured communication protocols, KPI frameworks, capability audits, investment planning, psychological safety, and regulatory alignment mechanisms. The integration of TOE and ADKAR offers a novel dual-lens perspective that extends existing knowledge. The findings provide practical guidance for managers and policymakers seeking to strengthen organisational systems and structures with human readiness factors in emerging economies.
- 22 September 2025
- Published by Asosiasi Doktor Sistem Informasi Indonesia in Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
- Vol. 7 (3) , 3005-3024
Open AccessRobotic Process Automation Readiness Barriers and Enablers in South Africa’s Energy Supply Chain
South Africa’s energy industry faces ongoing challenges including power shortages, ageing infrastructure, and supply chain inefficiencies, while, limited empirical evidence exists on how organisations in this industry prepare for Robotics Process Automation (RPA) adoption. This study examines the RPA readiness barriers and enablers within the supply chain of South Africa’s energy industry. The research adopts a qualitative design grounded in the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework and the Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement (ADKAR) change management model to connect technological capability with individual and organisational readiness for change. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 18 professionals representing eight stakeholder groups, including supply chain managers, IT specialists, process improvement leads, and employees affected by automation. Four key readiness barriers emerged: readiness gaps (61 mentions), organisational misalignment (158), infrastructure strain (83), and job security and resistance (60). Corresponding enablers included leadership accountability, RPA governance and alignment frameworks, readiness checklists, structured communication protocols, KPI frameworks, capability audits, investment planning, psychological safety, and regulatory alignment mechanisms. The integration of TOE and ADKAR offers a novel dual-lens perspective that extends existing knowledge. The findings provide practical guidance for managers and policymakers seeking to strengthen organisational systems and structures with human readiness factors in emerging economies.