HGHe Gao

He Gao

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


He Gao has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Changsheng Guo

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

    1 shared publication
  • Jian Xu

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment

    1 shared publication
  • Ningqing Lv

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

    1 shared publication
  • Ruonan Guo

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Applications and Perspectives of Life Cycle Assessment in the Green Design of Single-Atom Catalysts

    by He Gao, Ruonan Guo, Changsheng Guo, Ningqing Lv, Jian Xu

    Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have attracted extensive attention owing to their outstanding catalytic performance and nearly complete atom utilization efficiency. However, the environmental sustainability of SACs across their full life cycle has not yet been systematically investigated. This review emphasizes the necessity of integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) into SACs to support their sustainable development. By analyzing the structural characteristics, synthesis strategies, and representative application fields, this study examines how LCA principles can be employed to reveal the hidden environmental burdens associated with raw material extraction, synthesis processes, usage stages, and end-of-life management. Based on existing LCA case studies of catalytic materials, this review identifies the key challenges in the SACs field and proposes a preliminary framework for sustainable SAC design with LCA as a guiding approach. Finally, the review summarizes the current challenges and future perspectives, emphasizing that developing more specific evaluation standards, improving database construction, and adopting dynamic assessment methods are essential to shift LCA from a passive evaluation tool to an active design strategy that drives the green development of next-generation SACs.