Kongwen Wang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Kongwen Wang has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Sihan Zhang
School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
6 shared publications - Changjiang Zhang
School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
3 shared publications Qianqun Ma
3 shared publicationsZhibin Chen
3 shared publications琦 王
3 shared publicationsJianan Zhou
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 27 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Finance Research Letters
- Vol. 112
How do patient institutional investors mitigate corporate digital transformation hype? From the perspective of ownership stability
- 27 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Finance Research Letters
- Vol. 112
How do patient institutional investors mitigate corporate digital transformation hype? From the perspective of ownership stability
- Open Access
- 3 September 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (17) , 9048
Can Supply Chain Digitization Curb Corporate Greenwashing? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
Against the backdrop of the synergistic development of digitalization and green transformation, supply chain digitalization (SCD) plays a significant role in supporting companies’ green development; however, it remains unclear how it affects greenwashing. This study uses supply chain innovation and application pilots as a quasi-experimental design and employs panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies (2009–2024) and the difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct theoretical analysis and empirical testing. The results indicate that SCD significantly curbs corporate greenwashing; this conclusion holds even after robustness tests such as parallel trends tests, propensity score matching, and placebo tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that SCD curbs corporate greenwashing through two channels: (1) enhancing corporate green technological innovation capability and (2) alleviating information asymmetry. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that SCD’s inhibitory effect on corporate greenwashing is more pronounced among firms with higher debt financing costs, greater institutional investor ownership, and greater media coverage. From the perspective of SCD, this study offers insights for promoting corporate green transitions and enhancing ESG transparency, while providing practical guidance for government regulators to combat greenwashing.
- 3 September 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 18 (17) , 9048
Open AccessCan Supply Chain Digitization Curb Corporate Greenwashing? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
Against the backdrop of the synergistic development of digitalization and green transformation, supply chain digitalization (SCD) plays a significant role in supporting companies’ green development; however, it remains unclear how it affects greenwashing. This study uses supply chain innovation and application pilots as a quasi-experimental design and employs panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies (2009–2024) and the difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct theoretical analysis and empirical testing. The results indicate that SCD significantly curbs corporate greenwashing; this conclusion holds even after robustness tests such as parallel trends tests, propensity score matching, and placebo tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that SCD curbs corporate greenwashing through two channels: (1) enhancing corporate green technological innovation capability and (2) alleviating information asymmetry. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that SCD’s inhibitory effect on corporate greenwashing is more pronounced among firms with higher debt financing costs, greater institutional investor ownership, and greater media coverage. From the perspective of SCD, this study offers insights for promoting corporate green transitions and enhancing ESG transparency, while providing practical guidance for government regulators to combat greenwashing.
- Open Access
The Double-Edged Sword: How Does Corporate ESG Responsibility Fulfillment Shape Cost Stickiness?
Fulfilling corporate ESG responsibilities enhances a firm’s sustainable development capabilities but also comes at an economic cost. This study investigates whether firms should invest heavily in ESG or maintain moderate ESG practices to balance cost efficiency and resilience. Using a sample of A-share listed companies in China from 2012 to 2024, we employ OLS regression models to explore the impact of ESG responsibility fulfillment on cost stickiness and the factors that influence this relationship. The study finds that (1) there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate ESG responsibility fulfillment and cost stickiness; (2) the turning point lies between the B and CCC Huazheng ESG rating levels. Below this level, ESG responsibility fulfillment reduces cost stickiness, while above it, excessive ESG fulfillment increases cost stickiness; (3) environmental sensitivity, managerial overconfidence, and state ownership amplify this non-linear effect, making the reduction or increase in cost stickiness more pronounced. This paper deepens the understanding of the drivers of cost stickiness from the perspective of ESG responsibility fulfillment, offering new insights for future research on cost behavior and providing valuable guidance for firms seeking to optimize cost management through ESG strategies.
Open AccessThe Double-Edged Sword: How Does Corporate ESG Responsibility Fulfillment Shape Cost Stickiness?
Fulfilling corporate ESG responsibilities enhances a firm’s sustainable development capabilities but also comes at an economic cost. This study investigates whether firms should invest heavily in ESG or maintain moderate ESG practices to balance cost efficiency and resilience. Using a sample of A-share listed companies in China from 2012 to 2024, we employ OLS regression models to explore the impact of ESG responsibility fulfillment on cost stickiness and the factors that influence this relationship. The study finds that (1) there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate ESG responsibility fulfillment and cost stickiness; (2) the turning point lies between the B and CCC Huazheng ESG rating levels. Below this level, ESG responsibility fulfillment reduces cost stickiness, while above it, excessive ESG fulfillment increases cost stickiness; (3) environmental sensitivity, managerial overconfidence, and state ownership amplify this non-linear effect, making the reduction or increase in cost stickiness more pronounced. This paper deepens the understanding of the drivers of cost stickiness from the perspective of ESG responsibility fulfillment, offering new insights for future research on cost behavior and providing valuable guidance for firms seeking to optimize cost management through ESG strategies.
- 17 February 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
- Vol. 62 (8) , 2692-2712
Does the Market Value Corporate Digital Transformation? From the Perspective of Internal Control and Digital Innovation
- 17 February 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
- Vol. 62 (8) , 2692-2712
Does the Market Value Corporate Digital Transformation? From the Perspective of Internal Control and Digital Innovation
- 16 December 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
- Vol. 62 (10) , 3464-3483
Haste Makes Waste: How Do Patient Institutional Investors Deflate Corporate Digital Innovation Bubbles?
- 16 December 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
- Vol. 62 (10) , 3464-3483
Haste Makes Waste: How Do Patient Institutional Investors Deflate Corporate Digital Innovation Bubbles?
- Open Access
- 11 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (24) , 11127
From Intelligence to Creativity: Can AI Adoption Drive Sustained Corporate Innovation Investment?
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought unprecedented impact and opportunities for the sustainable development of family firms. This paper examines the impact of AI on innovation investment in family firms using a sample of Chinese A-share listed family firms from 2007 to 2024. The results show that AI significantly promotes innovation investment in family firms to achieve sustainable development. Mechanism analysis shows that AI enhances both the willingness and capability of family firms to invest in innovation by improving their risk-taking levels and resource allocation efficiency, thereby promoting innovation investment. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect of AI on innovation investment of family firms is more significant in smaller family firms, those directly founded by families, those with more family involvement in management, and those prior to intergenerational succession. Furthermore, the study finds that AI significantly improves the innovation performance of family firms. Our findings provide important theoretical and practical guidance for enterprises seeking to leverage AI to catalyze innovation investment and thereby achieve long-term value growth and sustainable development.
- 11 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 17 (24) , 11127
Open AccessFrom Intelligence to Creativity: Can AI Adoption Drive Sustained Corporate Innovation Investment?
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought unprecedented impact and opportunities for the sustainable development of family firms. This paper examines the impact of AI on innovation investment in family firms using a sample of Chinese A-share listed family firms from 2007 to 2024. The results show that AI significantly promotes innovation investment in family firms to achieve sustainable development. Mechanism analysis shows that AI enhances both the willingness and capability of family firms to invest in innovation by improving their risk-taking levels and resource allocation efficiency, thereby promoting innovation investment. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect of AI on innovation investment of family firms is more significant in smaller family firms, those directly founded by families, those with more family involvement in management, and those prior to intergenerational succession. Furthermore, the study finds that AI significantly improves the innovation performance of family firms. Our findings provide important theoretical and practical guidance for enterprises seeking to leverage AI to catalyze innovation investment and thereby achieve long-term value growth and sustainable development.
- 22 September 2025
资本市场开放能抑制企业研发操纵吗?——基于信息效应的实证研究
- 30 October 2024
- Published by Elsevier in International Review of Economics & Finance
- Vol. 96
Does reduced boilerplate of KAMs indicate increased audit effort? Evidence from China
- 30 October 2024
- Published by Elsevier in International Review of Economics & Finance
- Vol. 96
Does reduced boilerplate of KAMs indicate increased audit effort? Evidence from China
- 9 August 2023
- Published by Wiley in Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
- Vol. 52 (4) , 645-672
Does Differentiated Key Audit Matter in Unqualified Audit Reports Indicate Increased Financial Misstatement Risk? Evidence from China*
This study examines whether differentiated disclosure of key audit matter (KAM) in China indicates a higher financial misstatement risk. Our empirical study demonstrates that financial statements with less boilerplate KAM are more likely to be subsequently restated than those with more boilerplate KAM. This association is only pronounced for smaller auditing firms in stronger legal environments. Additionally, auditors who report differentiated KAM are likely to disclose more risk‐related information. Moreover, clients are more likely to restate financial reports when the KAM relates to managers' subjective estimations.
- 9 August 2023
- Published by Wiley in Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
- Vol. 52 (4) , 645-672
Does Differentiated Key Audit Matter in Unqualified Audit Reports Indicate Increased Financial Misstatement Risk? Evidence from China*
This study examines whether differentiated disclosure of key audit matter (KAM) in China indicates a higher financial misstatement risk. Our empirical study demonstrates that financial statements with less boilerplate KAM are more likely to be subsequently restated than those with more boilerplate KAM. This association is only pronounced for smaller auditing firms in stronger legal environments. Additionally, auditors who report differentiated KAM are likely to disclose more risk‐related information. Moreover, clients are more likely to restate financial reports when the KAM relates to managers' subjective estimations.