NWNneka Watson

Nneka Watson

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Nneka Watson has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Bradford C. Dickerson

    Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Massachusetts Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Daisy Hochberg

    Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02129, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Deepti Putcha

    Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA

    1 shared publication
  • Megan Quimby

    Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02129, USA

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    The Heterogeneity of Reading and Spelling Deficits in Posterior Cortical Atrophy

    by Nneka Watson, Megan Quimby, Daisy Hochberg, Bradford C. Dickerson, Deepti Putcha

    Background: Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) is a clinical syndrome marked by progressive visuospatial impairment, usually due to underlying Alzheimer’s disease. While reading and spelling deficits are recognized clinical features of this syndrome, the contributions of visuoperceptual versus linguistic deficits to these impairments are still unclear. Methods: To that end, we examined reading and spelling performance in 23 individuals from the Massachusetts General Hospital PCA cohort. Participants completed tests of reading from the Western Aphasia Battery and spelling to dictation from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. A mixed-methods analysis included quantitative scoring and qualitative observations of visual behaviors, error patterns, and compensatory strategies. Results: Participants commonly demonstrated visual scanning errors, difficulty following multi-line text, and spelling errors reflecting both visual–perceptual and orthographic–linguistic breakdowns. Conclusions: Because reading and spelling in PCA are variably impaired cognitive skills driven by visual deficits and lexical vulnerability, assessments and interventions must account for deficits in both cognitive processes. Our findings highlight the vulnerability of reading and spelling in PCA and underscore the need for multimodal assessment strategies that account for the interplay of visual, phonological, and lexical processes. These insights can inform diagnosis and guide the development of accessible interventions tailored to optimize compensatory strategies to support functional language abilities.