Mariana Mutis Gómez
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Interests
Mariana Mutis Gómez has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jairo Nuñez Rodriguez
Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, University Campus Km 7 Vía Piedecuesta, Floridablanca 681007, Colombia
1 shared publication - Mario Guerrero-Torres
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Santo Tomas de Aquino, Bucaramanga, Colombia
1 shared publication - Sylvia María Villarreal-Archila
Faculty of Industrial Engineering, SOLYDO Research Group, Unidades Tecnológicas de Santander, Av. Los Estudiantes 9-82, Bucaramanga 680005, Colombia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Composites Science
- Vol. 9 (11) , 579
Assessing the Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Dental Clinical Workflows: A Process-Oriented Approach
Additive manufacturing (AM) is rapidly transforming clinical workflows in dentistry by enabling the customized, efficient, and digitally integrated production of dental devices. However, the existing literature lacks a process-oriented perspective on its technical and operational impact. This study aims to address this gap through a dual-phase analysis using the Input–Transformation–Output (ITO) framework, providing practical insights into the operational reconfiguration enabled by AM. The first phase examined materials, image acquisition methods, design and lamination software, printing technologies, and key parameters across each stage of the AM workflow. The second phase analyzed four clinical applications (dental models, crowns and bridges, occlusal splints, and surgical guides) supported by a structured fabrication protocol and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of 18 resin samples to assess surface quality and process-related defects. In addition, for each application, a comparative process analysis with traditional workflows was conducted using ASME diagramming. The findings indicate that AM reduces cycle times, manual intervention, and supply chain reliance while enabling production models such as Make-to-Order (MTO) and Engineer-to-Order (ETO). Its integration also fosters decentralized, in-clinic manufacturing with enhanced autonomy, flexibility, and reduced lead times. Nonetheless, this study highlights persisting challenges, including post-processing quality control, training requirements, and cost-efficiency concerns in low-volume settings. A hybrid model combining AM with conventional methods emerges as a pragmatic strategy for clinical adoption.
- 28 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Composites Science
- Vol. 9 (11) , 579
Open AccessAssessing the Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Dental Clinical Workflows: A Process-Oriented Approach
Additive manufacturing (AM) is rapidly transforming clinical workflows in dentistry by enabling the customized, efficient, and digitally integrated production of dental devices. However, the existing literature lacks a process-oriented perspective on its technical and operational impact. This study aims to address this gap through a dual-phase analysis using the Input–Transformation–Output (ITO) framework, providing practical insights into the operational reconfiguration enabled by AM. The first phase examined materials, image acquisition methods, design and lamination software, printing technologies, and key parameters across each stage of the AM workflow. The second phase analyzed four clinical applications (dental models, crowns and bridges, occlusal splints, and surgical guides) supported by a structured fabrication protocol and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of 18 resin samples to assess surface quality and process-related defects. In addition, for each application, a comparative process analysis with traditional workflows was conducted using ASME diagramming. The findings indicate that AM reduces cycle times, manual intervention, and supply chain reliance while enabling production models such as Make-to-Order (MTO) and Engineer-to-Order (ETO). Its integration also fosters decentralized, in-clinic manufacturing with enhanced autonomy, flexibility, and reduced lead times. Nonetheless, this study highlights persisting challenges, including post-processing quality control, training requirements, and cost-efficiency concerns in low-volume settings. A hybrid model combining AM with conventional methods emerges as a pragmatic strategy for clinical adoption.