Milad K. Tabatabai
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Milad K. Tabatabai has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Emily Wenande
Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Grethe Schmidt
Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Johan Sieborg
Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Katrine Elisabeth Karmisholt
Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Merete Haedersdal
Department of Dermatology Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Copenhagen Denmark
1 shared publication - Nina L. Mårtensson
Department of Pathology, Centre of Diagnostic Investigation, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 October 2025
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Dermato-Venereologica
- Vol. 105, adv44224
Margin Status following Simple Excision of Head and Neck Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study of 9,291 Excisions
A mainstay treatment of head and neck basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is excision with a fixed surgical margin. Large-scale evaluation of post-surgical margin status is necessary to improve outcomes. This cross-sectional study assessed margin outcomes following excision of head and neck BCCs across Danish healthcare settings, including risk factors for tumour-positive margins. Histopathology records on BCCs excised by all medical specialities between 1 January–31 December 2022 were retrieved from The Danish Pathology Bank. Cases with intraoperative microscopic margin assessment were excluded. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression determined complete excision proportions and risk factors for positive margins. Including 9,291 BCC excisions in 7,741 patients, the tumour-free proportion was 80.0% (95% CI: 79.2–80.8%). Significant variation occurred by histologic subtype, with tumour-free margins ranging from 60.6% in morpheaform to 83.6% in nodular BCCs. Multivariable analyses also identified morpheaform, micronodular, infiltrating, and superficial subtypes, auricular/postauricular locations, small specimen size, and advancing age as risk factors for tumour-positive margins. The nose was a risk factor in univariable analysis. Simple excision of head and neck BCCs shows notable variation in margin outcomes by patient, tumour, and specimen profile. To minimise recurrence and optimise resources, increased awareness of positive margins is essential.
- 28 October 2025
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Dermato-Venereologica
- Vol. 105, adv44224
Open AccessMargin Status following Simple Excision of Head and Neck Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study of 9,291 Excisions
A mainstay treatment of head and neck basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is excision with a fixed surgical margin. Large-scale evaluation of post-surgical margin status is necessary to improve outcomes. This cross-sectional study assessed margin outcomes following excision of head and neck BCCs across Danish healthcare settings, including risk factors for tumour-positive margins. Histopathology records on BCCs excised by all medical specialities between 1 January–31 December 2022 were retrieved from The Danish Pathology Bank. Cases with intraoperative microscopic margin assessment were excluded. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression determined complete excision proportions and risk factors for positive margins. Including 9,291 BCC excisions in 7,741 patients, the tumour-free proportion was 80.0% (95% CI: 79.2–80.8%). Significant variation occurred by histologic subtype, with tumour-free margins ranging from 60.6% in morpheaform to 83.6% in nodular BCCs. Multivariable analyses also identified morpheaform, micronodular, infiltrating, and superficial subtypes, auricular/postauricular locations, small specimen size, and advancing age as risk factors for tumour-positive margins. The nose was a risk factor in univariable analysis. Simple excision of head and neck BCCs shows notable variation in margin outcomes by patient, tumour, and specimen profile. To minimise recurrence and optimise resources, increased awareness of positive margins is essential.