Gabrielly Chechi Giraldi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Gabrielly Chechi Giraldi has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Amanda Scussiato
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, SC, Brazil
1 shared publication - Ana Luiza Bachmann Schogor
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil
1 shared publication - Ana Luiza de Freitas dos Santos
Department of Animal Science, University of the State of Santa Catarina, Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil
1 shared publication - Idacir Antonio Santin Junior
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, SC, Brazil
1 shared publication - Isadora Zago
Graduate Program in Animal Science, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, SC, Brazil
1 shared publication - Jacir Dal Magro
Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences Community University of the Chapecó Region – UNO Chapecó Santa Catarina Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Fermentation
- Vol. 11 (11) , 630
Comparative Evaluation of Ionophores on the In Vitro Fermentation Dynamics of Wheat Silage Using a Gas Production System
Wheat silage is an underexplored forage in ruminant nutrition that offers potential benefits due to its high crude protein content and capacity to mitigate methane emissions. However, little is known about its interaction with feed additives. This study evaluated the effects of monensin (25 ppm) and narasin (13 ppm) on the in vitro ruminal fermentation of wheat silage using a randomized complete block design with three treatments and seven replicates per incubation. Gas production was recorded over 48 h, and fermentation parameters, including pH, in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), metabolizable energy (ME), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles, were determined. Both ionophores maintained a higher ruminal pH compared to the control (p < 0.01) and reduced total gas production, ME, and IVOMD (p < 0.01), without significant differences between monensin and narasin. No effects were observed on total VFA production, acetate-to-propionate ratio, or ammonia concentration, although isobutyrate was reduced (p < 0.01). Fermentation kinetics revealed decreased gas production and digestion rates in the slowly degradable fraction, particularly with monensin. In conclusion, ionophores modulated fermentation but did not improve digestibility or energy availability, suggesting limited nutritional benefits when wheat silage is used as the sole forage source.
- 5 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Fermentation
- Vol. 11 (11) , 630
Open AccessComparative Evaluation of Ionophores on the In Vitro Fermentation Dynamics of Wheat Silage Using a Gas Production System
Wheat silage is an underexplored forage in ruminant nutrition that offers potential benefits due to its high crude protein content and capacity to mitigate methane emissions. However, little is known about its interaction with feed additives. This study evaluated the effects of monensin (25 ppm) and narasin (13 ppm) on the in vitro ruminal fermentation of wheat silage using a randomized complete block design with three treatments and seven replicates per incubation. Gas production was recorded over 48 h, and fermentation parameters, including pH, in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), metabolizable energy (ME), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles, were determined. Both ionophores maintained a higher ruminal pH compared to the control (p < 0.01) and reduced total gas production, ME, and IVOMD (p < 0.01), without significant differences between monensin and narasin. No effects were observed on total VFA production, acetate-to-propionate ratio, or ammonia concentration, although isobutyrate was reduced (p < 0.01). Fermentation kinetics revealed decreased gas production and digestion rates in the slowly degradable fraction, particularly with monensin. In conclusion, ionophores modulated fermentation but did not improve digestibility or energy availability, suggesting limited nutritional benefits when wheat silage is used as the sole forage source.