Ivan Kocan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Interests
Ivan Kocan has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daniela Mokra
Department of Physiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia
1 shared publication - Karin Kackova
Department of Pharmacology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-036 01 Martin, Slovakia
1 shared publication - Marta Joskova
Department of Pharmacology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-036 01 Martin, Slovakia
1 shared publication - Martina Šutovská
Department of Pharmacology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Malá Hora 10701/4A, 03601 Martin, Slovakia
1 shared publication - Soňa Fraňová
Department of Pharmacology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
1 shared publication - Vladimira Sadlonova
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antioxidants
- Vol. 14 (11) , 1340
Respiratory Ciliary Beat Frequency in COPD: Balancing Oxidative Stress and Pharmacological Treatment
In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysregulated calcium homeostasis, oxidative stress, and mucus hypersecretion converge to suppress ciliary beat frequency (CBF), thereby compromising mucociliary clearance (MCC). These mechanisms are subject to pharmacological modulation. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) exert direct cilia-stimulatory effects and may counteract pathogen-induced mucin overproduction without impairing clearance. Long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) enhance ciliary activity through the cAMP–PKA–dynein (cyclic adenosine monophosphate–protein kinase A–dynein) signalling pathway. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), although largely neutral on CBF, provide indirect protection by suppressing IL-13–driven inflammation. Phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibitors sustain intracellular cAMP and promote ciliary motility, though their clinical use remains limited by adverse effects. Emerging evidence suggests that dual and triple therapies may provide additive or synergistic benefits for preserving mucociliary function. Clinically, ex vivo CBF interpretation may be influenced by ongoing pharmacotherapy and tissue sampling site. Nasal brush samples may predominantly reflect systemic rather than inhaled therapy. Moreover, differences in PDE isoform expression between nasal and bronchial epithelium further complicate direct extrapolation of results. Rigorous patient stratification by treatment regimen is therefore essential to reconcile inconsistencies reported across studies. Ultimately, preservation of MCC in COPD depends on a delicate balance between oxidative stress and pharmacological modulation of ciliary function.
- 6 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Antioxidants
- Vol. 14 (11) , 1340
Open AccessRespiratory Ciliary Beat Frequency in COPD: Balancing Oxidative Stress and Pharmacological Treatment
In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysregulated calcium homeostasis, oxidative stress, and mucus hypersecretion converge to suppress ciliary beat frequency (CBF), thereby compromising mucociliary clearance (MCC). These mechanisms are subject to pharmacological modulation. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) exert direct cilia-stimulatory effects and may counteract pathogen-induced mucin overproduction without impairing clearance. Long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) enhance ciliary activity through the cAMP–PKA–dynein (cyclic adenosine monophosphate–protein kinase A–dynein) signalling pathway. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), although largely neutral on CBF, provide indirect protection by suppressing IL-13–driven inflammation. Phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibitors sustain intracellular cAMP and promote ciliary motility, though their clinical use remains limited by adverse effects. Emerging evidence suggests that dual and triple therapies may provide additive or synergistic benefits for preserving mucociliary function. Clinically, ex vivo CBF interpretation may be influenced by ongoing pharmacotherapy and tissue sampling site. Nasal brush samples may predominantly reflect systemic rather than inhaled therapy. Moreover, differences in PDE isoform expression between nasal and bronchial epithelium further complicate direct extrapolation of results. Rigorous patient stratification by treatment regimen is therefore essential to reconcile inconsistencies reported across studies. Ultimately, preservation of MCC in COPD depends on a delicate balance between oxidative stress and pharmacological modulation of ciliary function.