Weidong Chen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Weidong Chen has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dongrong Xu
The Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, USA
1 shared publication - Li Zhang
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China
1 shared publication - Ruidong Cheng
Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Digital-Intelligent Rehabilitation Equipment, Hangzhou, China
1 shared publication - Runjie Ni
Hangzhou Shenyulan Medical Tech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310018, China
1 shared publication - Shan Fang
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China
1 shared publication - Tian Zhou
College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Bioengineering
- Vol. 12 (11) , 1218
Quantifying Similarity of Dynamic Brain Networks: Two Novel Indices for Structural Change and Temporal Evolution
Brain functional connectivity evolves dynamically during brain development, aging, illness, and cognitive activities. Traditional methods rely on static network snapshots, which do not capture the dynamics of the brain. We propose two new indices: Dynamic Network Similarity (DNS) to measure both temporal and structural dynamic similarity and Dynamic Network Evolution Similarity (DNES) to specifically measure the temporal evolution of dynamic networks. Performance was tested using simulated dynamic networks controlled by four variables (Δφ, λ, α, and β) concerning evolution variations in phase, relative amplitude, noise power, and the span of connectivity strength, respectively. Furthermore, real-world fMRI data from 25 stroke patients pre/post transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) rehabilitation were used to test the indices. Patients were randomly sub-grouped into tDCS1 and tDCS2. DNS and DNES thus compared those who received the same therapy (ST: tDCS1 versus tDCS2) and those who received different therapies (DT: tDCS1 versus sham-tDCS). The results showed that DNS was sensitive to all dynamic features, and DNES was primarily sensitive to Δφ and λ. Both indices were able to detect overall difference and capture significantly higher similarity in the ST groups than in the DT groups. Briefly, DNS and DNES appear to be effective tools for studying dynamically evolving brain networks, and may serve as alternatives to traditional static methods. They are particularly useful for analyzing longitudinal neuroimaging data in contexts such as neurodevelopment, aging, and recovery from illness.
- 7 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Bioengineering
- Vol. 12 (11) , 1218
Open AccessQuantifying Similarity of Dynamic Brain Networks: Two Novel Indices for Structural Change and Temporal Evolution
Brain functional connectivity evolves dynamically during brain development, aging, illness, and cognitive activities. Traditional methods rely on static network snapshots, which do not capture the dynamics of the brain. We propose two new indices: Dynamic Network Similarity (DNS) to measure both temporal and structural dynamic similarity and Dynamic Network Evolution Similarity (DNES) to specifically measure the temporal evolution of dynamic networks. Performance was tested using simulated dynamic networks controlled by four variables (Δφ, λ, α, and β) concerning evolution variations in phase, relative amplitude, noise power, and the span of connectivity strength, respectively. Furthermore, real-world fMRI data from 25 stroke patients pre/post transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) rehabilitation were used to test the indices. Patients were randomly sub-grouped into tDCS1 and tDCS2. DNS and DNES thus compared those who received the same therapy (ST: tDCS1 versus tDCS2) and those who received different therapies (DT: tDCS1 versus sham-tDCS). The results showed that DNS was sensitive to all dynamic features, and DNES was primarily sensitive to Δφ and λ. Both indices were able to detect overall difference and capture significantly higher similarity in the ST groups than in the DT groups. Briefly, DNS and DNES appear to be effective tools for studying dynamically evolving brain networks, and may serve as alternatives to traditional static methods. They are particularly useful for analyzing longitudinal neuroimaging data in contexts such as neurodevelopment, aging, and recovery from illness.