Ali Aldubaikhi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Ali Aldubaikhi has a total of 1 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Sarosh Patel
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT 06604, USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (12) , 5854
S-Drone-YOLO: A Parameter-Efficient P2-Guided Quality-Aware YOLO Detector for Infrared Small UAV Detection
Infrared small-UAV detection remains difficult because the target often appears as a weak thermal point rather than a clear object. This problem is clear in the SIDD dataset, where most test targets are smaller than 32 × 32 pixels. To address this case, this paper proposes S-Drone-YOLO, a compact YOLO-based detector that maintains a high-resolution P2 prediction path and leverages it carefully during classification. The model starts from a lightweight YOLOv5-style detector. It adds a stride-4 P2 path and replaces the C3 neck blocks with C2fAttn to improve feature reuse before prediction. Two components are then added to the Architecture II design. The Coordinate-Aware Residual C2f Block, CAR-C2f, strengthens the P2 branch using coordinate attention and residual scaling. The P2-Guided Quality-Aware Detection Head (P2-QADH) combines local P2 details with nearby P3 context. It produces a quality map that adjusts the classification logits. The regression branch, output tensor format, and training loss interface remain unchanged. On the SIDD infrared drone dataset, S-Drone-YOLO reaches 0.988 precision, 0.939 recall, 0.699 mAP50-95, and 0.962 F1-score. It uses 6.45 M parameters and 31.3 GFLOPs. Compared with the Architecture I model, recall increases by 0.8 percentage points and mAP50-95 increases by 0.4 percentage points. At the same time, the parameter count decreases by 20.3%, and GFLOPs decrease by 43.7%. Fine-tuning on five RGB UAV datasets and a second thermal dataset (ThermalUAV2UAV) yields F1 scores ranging from 0.941 to 0.999, with an mAP50-95 of 0.843 on the thermal dataset. The background analysis also shows stable F1-scores across sky, sea, city, and mountain scenes. These results suggest that controlled P2 guidance can improve infrared small-UAV detection while keeping the model size practical.
- 10 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 16 (12) , 5854
Open AccessS-Drone-YOLO: A Parameter-Efficient P2-Guided Quality-Aware YOLO Detector for Infrared Small UAV Detection
Infrared small-UAV detection remains difficult because the target often appears as a weak thermal point rather than a clear object. This problem is clear in the SIDD dataset, where most test targets are smaller than 32 × 32 pixels. To address this case, this paper proposes S-Drone-YOLO, a compact YOLO-based detector that maintains a high-resolution P2 prediction path and leverages it carefully during classification. The model starts from a lightweight YOLOv5-style detector. It adds a stride-4 P2 path and replaces the C3 neck blocks with C2fAttn to improve feature reuse before prediction. Two components are then added to the Architecture II design. The Coordinate-Aware Residual C2f Block, CAR-C2f, strengthens the P2 branch using coordinate attention and residual scaling. The P2-Guided Quality-Aware Detection Head (P2-QADH) combines local P2 details with nearby P3 context. It produces a quality map that adjusts the classification logits. The regression branch, output tensor format, and training loss interface remain unchanged. On the SIDD infrared drone dataset, S-Drone-YOLO reaches 0.988 precision, 0.939 recall, 0.699 mAP50-95, and 0.962 F1-score. It uses 6.45 M parameters and 31.3 GFLOPs. Compared with the Architecture I model, recall increases by 0.8 percentage points and mAP50-95 increases by 0.4 percentage points. At the same time, the parameter count decreases by 20.3%, and GFLOPs decrease by 43.7%. Fine-tuning on five RGB UAV datasets and a second thermal dataset (ThermalUAV2UAV) yields F1 scores ranging from 0.941 to 0.999, with an mAP50-95 of 0.843 on the thermal dataset. The background analysis also shows stable F1-scores across sky, sea, city, and mountain scenes. These results suggest that controlled P2 guidance can improve infrared small-UAV detection while keeping the model size practical.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 7 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (22) , 11882
Advancements in Small-Object Detection (2023–2025): Approaches, Datasets, Benchmarks, Applications, and Practical Guidance
Small-object detection (SOD) remains an important and growing challenge in computer vision and is the backbone of many applications, including autonomous vehicles, aerial surveillance, medical imaging, and industrial quality control. Small objects, in pixels, lose discriminative features during deep neural network processing, making them difficult to disentangle from background noise and other artifacts. This survey presents a comprehensive and systematic review of the SOD advancements between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the maturation of transformer-based architectures and a return to efficient, realistic deployment. We applied the PRISMA methodology for this work, yielding 112 seminal works in the field to ensure the robustness of our foundation for this study. We present a critical taxonomy of the developments since 2023, arranged in five categories: (1) multiscale feature learning; (2) transformer-based architectures; (3) context-aware methods; (4) data augmentation enhancements; and (5) advancements to mainstream detectors (e.g., YOLO). Third, we describe and analyze the evolving SOD-centered datasets and benchmarks and establish the importance of evaluating models fairly. Fourth, we contribute a comparative assessment of state-of-the-art models, evaluating not only accuracy (e.g., the average precision for small objects (AP_S)) but also important efficiency (FPS, latency, parameters, GFLOPS) metrics across standardized hardware platforms, including edge devices. We further use data-driven case studies in the remote sensing, manufacturing, and healthcare domains to create a bridge between academic benchmarks and real-world performance. Finally, we summarize practical guidance for practitioners, the model selection decision matrix, scenario-based playbooks, and the deployment checklist. The goal of this work is to help synthesize the recent progress, identify the primary limitations in SOD, and open research directions, including the potential future role of generative AI and foundational models, to address the long-standing data and feature representation challenges that have limited SOD.
- 7 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 15 (22) , 11882
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessAdvancements in Small-Object Detection (2023–2025): Approaches, Datasets, Benchmarks, Applications, and Practical Guidance
Small-object detection (SOD) remains an important and growing challenge in computer vision and is the backbone of many applications, including autonomous vehicles, aerial surveillance, medical imaging, and industrial quality control. Small objects, in pixels, lose discriminative features during deep neural network processing, making them difficult to disentangle from background noise and other artifacts. This survey presents a comprehensive and systematic review of the SOD advancements between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the maturation of transformer-based architectures and a return to efficient, realistic deployment. We applied the PRISMA methodology for this work, yielding 112 seminal works in the field to ensure the robustness of our foundation for this study. We present a critical taxonomy of the developments since 2023, arranged in five categories: (1) multiscale feature learning; (2) transformer-based architectures; (3) context-aware methods; (4) data augmentation enhancements; and (5) advancements to mainstream detectors (e.g., YOLO). Third, we describe and analyze the evolving SOD-centered datasets and benchmarks and establish the importance of evaluating models fairly. Fourth, we contribute a comparative assessment of state-of-the-art models, evaluating not only accuracy (e.g., the average precision for small objects (AP_S)) but also important efficiency (FPS, latency, parameters, GFLOPS) metrics across standardized hardware platforms, including edge devices. We further use data-driven case studies in the remote sensing, manufacturing, and healthcare domains to create a bridge between academic benchmarks and real-world performance. Finally, we summarize practical guidance for practitioners, the model selection decision matrix, scenario-based playbooks, and the deployment checklist. The goal of this work is to help synthesize the recent progress, identify the primary limitations in SOD, and open research directions, including the potential future role of generative AI and foundational models, to address the long-standing data and feature representation challenges that have limited SOD.