Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Lidija Tepeš Golubić has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    The Small Sample Challenge: Unsupervised Authorship Clustering in Croatian

    by Lidija Tepeš Golubić, Ian Marković, Andrea Ledić, Brigitta Cafuta

    Many forensic methods have been developed for uncovering authors of threatening letters to get rid of their anonymous nature. With the development of new tools for the digital creation of threatening letters, such methods became obsolete, yet new options for their digital analysis also became available. This paper covers a method for digital analysis of threatening letters written in the Croatian language using machine learning algorithms. First the techniques for extraction of style elements of a text are covered, focusing on the most influential elements, and then transforming the extracted data into a vectorized form which can be used in machine learning models. The models are built upon the autoencoder architecture in combination with two text style vectorization methods. Multiple such models are implemented and their results are compared and analyzed, focusing on their effectiveness and the quality of their results. Finally, additional possibilities for further development of machine learning models for the analysis of threatening letters written in the Croatian language are covered and their possible effectiveness explained.

  • Open Access

    Statistical Modeling of 15-Min Changes of Production from Renewable Sources

    by Dubravko Sabolić, Lidija Tepeš Golubić, Goran Slipac

    In this paper, 15-min production data from renewable energy sources (RES), aggregated by technology (onshore wind, offshore wind, solar) and by country (Germany, Austria, Hungary), are analyzed. The concept of a confidence interval is introduced as a parameter for practical use in power-system management. In probabilistic dimensioning of the FRR (Frequency Restoration Reserve; sometimes also called “secondary reserve”), it is necessary to ensure reserve sufficiency for a high percentage of time p, in the order of 99.9%. The confidence interval is specified by upper and lower deviation limits, expressed as percentages of the total installed capacity of the observed RES system, not to be exceeded with a probability greater than 1−p. The concept of the “regulation multiplier” is also considered, which essentially indicates how many additional megawatts of RES capacity can be installed for each added megawatt of FRR capacity, ceteris paribus. Finally, a previously experimentally developed regulation-multiplier model is verified by replicating the original research on a new dataset used in this paper.