ZZZijiao Zhang

Zijiao Zhang

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Zijiao Zhang has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Association of total and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity with stroke risk: A dose–response meta-analysis of 2,639,086 participants from 14 international prospective cohort studies

    by Zheng Li, Zijiao Zhang, Yuru Zhang, Chi Zhang, Xuesi Li, Chenghua Tian, Jun Liang, Tongyu Ma, Weihong Huang, Jianbo Lei

    Background: Stroke is the second leading cause of death and third leading cause of disability globally. The dose–response relationship between physical activity (PA), particularly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and stroke risk remains unclear, with limited sex-specific evidence. Aims: To examine the dose–response associations of total PA and MVPA with stroke risk, considering sex and subtype differences. Methods: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies published between 2013 and 2024, with follow-up durations ranging from 4.9 to 17.9 years, were conducted. PA exposures were standardized to MET-hours per week (MET-h/wk), and incident stroke was the primary outcome. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Dose–response associations were assessed using restricted cubic spline models. Analyses stratified by sex and subtype were performed when available. Results: Fourteen cohorts (n = 2,639,086) were included. Total PA showed a nonlinear inverse association with stroke risk: each 10 MET-h/wk increment reduced risk by 1% up to 130 MET-h/wk, corresponding to a 13% maximum reduction, after which benefits plateaued. MVPA exhibited an L-shaped association (P < 0.001), with the greatest benefit (19% reduction) at 19 MET-h/wk, followed by a gradual increase in risk. Sex-stratified analysis revealed a J-shaped pattern in females (optimal 10–15 MET-h/wk; 18% reduction). For males, the HR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.70–1.13), and a nonlinear model could not be established due to limited data. In ischemic stroke, dose–response patterns paralleled those for total stroke. Conclusions: The study found a significant dose–response relationship between total PA and MVPA with stroke risk. Optimal prevention was observed at 130 MET-h/wk for total PA and 19 MET-h/wk for MVPA. Evidence in males and for hemorrhagic stroke remains limited and warrants further study.