Jungang Ma
Jungang Ma has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hua Zhuo
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Research Institute of Measurement & Testing, Urumqi, China
3 shared publications - Mei Tao
Xinjiang Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft Performance and Safety Key Laboratory, Urumqi 830011, China
2 shared publications - Mei Yang
Xinjiang Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft Performance and Safety Key Laboratory, Urumqi 830011, China
2 shared publications - Aihemaitijiang Sidike
School of Physical Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
1 shared publication - Guo-Hui Niu
Xinjiang Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft Performance and Safety Key Laboratory, Urumqi 830011, China
1 shared publication - Jun Li
School of Physical Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Real-Time UAV Positioning Error Estimation
Accurate real-time positioning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is critical for navigation and mapping but remains challenging in complex environments due to signal blockages and multipath effects. This study presents a comparative framework for real-time error prediction of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), evaluating two machine learning models (Random Forest and XGBoost) and a deep learning model (Long Short-Term Memory network) against an Extended Kalman Filter baseline. A high-precision total station provides ground-truth coordinates, enabling the derivation of positioning error labels from synchronized GNSS raw data. Among the evaluated models, the tree-based XGBoost model achieves a significantly lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) and a considerably higher Coefficient of Determination () score than other models in predicting positioning deviations. The high-accuracy error predictions from the optimal model establish the core of a software-only solution for positioning integrity. The framework demonstrates that reliable, real-time error estimates can be derived directly from observation data, providing the essential input required for future compensation systems without necessitating additional hardware.Open AccessA Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Real-Time UAV Positioning Error Estimation
Accurate real-time positioning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is critical for navigation and mapping but remains challenging in complex environments due to signal blockages and multipath effects. This study presents a comparative framework for real-time error prediction of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), evaluating two machine learning models (Random Forest and XGBoost) and a deep learning model (Long Short-Term Memory network) against an Extended Kalman Filter baseline. A high-precision total station provides ground-truth coordinates, enabling the derivation of positioning error labels from synchronized GNSS raw data. Among the evaluated models, the tree-based XGBoost model achieves a significantly lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) and a considerably higher Coefficient of Determination () score than other models in predicting positioning deviations. The high-accuracy error predictions from the optimal model establish the core of a software-only solution for positioning integrity. The framework demonstrates that reliable, real-time error estimates can be derived directly from observation data, providing the essential input required for future compensation systems without necessitating additional hardware. - Top Cited PapersOpen Access
Visualization Techniques for Spray Monitoring in Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems: A Review
Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) has rapidly advanced precision crop protection. However, the spray performance of UASSs is influenced by nozzle atomization, rotor-induced airflow, and external environmental conditions. These factors cause strong spatiotemporal coupling and high uncertainty. As a result, visualization-based monitoring techniques are now essential for understanding these dynamics and supporting spray modeling and drift-mitigation design. This review highlights developments in spray visualization technologies along the “droplet–airflow–target” chain mechanism in UASS spraying. We first outline the physical fundamentals of droplet formation, liquid-sheet breakup, droplet size distribution, and transport mechanisms in rotor-induced flow. Dominant processes are identified across near-field, mid-field, and far-field scales. Next, we summarize major visualization methods. These include optical imaging (PDPA/PDIA, HSI, DIH), laser-based scattering and ranging (LD, LiDAR), and flow-field visualization (PIV). We compare their spatial resolution, measurement range, 3D reconstruction capabilities, and possible sources of error. We then review wind-tunnel trials, field experiments, and point-cloud reconstruction studies. These studies show how downwash flow and tip vortices affect plume structure, canopy disturbance, and deposition patterns. Finally, we discuss emerging intelligent analysis for large-scale monitoring—such as image-based droplet recognition, multimodal data fusion, and data-driven modeling. We outline future directions, including unified feature systems, vortex-coupled models, and embedded closed-loop spray control. This review is a comprehensive reference for advancing UASS analysis, drift assessment, spray optimization, and smart support systems.
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessVisualization Techniques for Spray Monitoring in Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems: A Review
Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems (UASS) has rapidly advanced precision crop protection. However, the spray performance of UASSs is influenced by nozzle atomization, rotor-induced airflow, and external environmental conditions. These factors cause strong spatiotemporal coupling and high uncertainty. As a result, visualization-based monitoring techniques are now essential for understanding these dynamics and supporting spray modeling and drift-mitigation design. This review highlights developments in spray visualization technologies along the “droplet–airflow–target” chain mechanism in UASS spraying. We first outline the physical fundamentals of droplet formation, liquid-sheet breakup, droplet size distribution, and transport mechanisms in rotor-induced flow. Dominant processes are identified across near-field, mid-field, and far-field scales. Next, we summarize major visualization methods. These include optical imaging (PDPA/PDIA, HSI, DIH), laser-based scattering and ranging (LD, LiDAR), and flow-field visualization (PIV). We compare their spatial resolution, measurement range, 3D reconstruction capabilities, and possible sources of error. We then review wind-tunnel trials, field experiments, and point-cloud reconstruction studies. These studies show how downwash flow and tip vortices affect plume structure, canopy disturbance, and deposition patterns. Finally, we discuss emerging intelligent analysis for large-scale monitoring—such as image-based droplet recognition, multimodal data fusion, and data-driven modeling. We outline future directions, including unified feature systems, vortex-coupled models, and embedded closed-loop spray control. This review is a comprehensive reference for advancing UASS analysis, drift assessment, spray optimization, and smart support systems.
- Open Access
Gaussian Process-Based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Optimal Calibration Point Selection
Temperature and humidity calibration chambers, which provide controlled environments for instrument testing and validation, are widely applied in the aerospace and biomedicine fields. However, traditional fixed calibration points fail to adapt to complex operational requirements and exhibit problems including a limited coverage range and low efficiency. To address these challenges, this study develops a Gaussian Process-based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization (GP-MFBO) framework for optimal selection of temperature and humidity calibration points. The framework integrates the following three key components: (1) a three-layer progressive multi-fidelity modeling system comprising physical analytical models, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulations, and experimental verification; (2) a systematic uncertainty quantification system covering model uncertainty, parameter uncertainty, and observation uncertainty; and (3) an adaptive acquisition function that balances uncertainty penalty mechanisms and multi-fidelity information gain evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GP-MFBO method achieves optimal calibration point combinations with a temperature uniformity score of 0.149 and humidity uniformity score of 2.38, approaching theoretical optimal solutions within 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Compared to standard Gaussian process, Co-Kriging, two-stage optimization, polynomial regression, and traditional single-fidelity methods, GP-MFBO achieves uniformity score improvements of up to 81.7% and 76.3% for temperature and humidity, respectively. The prediction confidence interval coverage reaches 94.2%, outperforming all comparative methods. This research provides a rigorous theoretical foundation and technical solution for the scientific design and reliable operation of large-space temperature and humidity calibration systems.
Open AccessGaussian Process-Based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Optimal Calibration Point Selection
Temperature and humidity calibration chambers, which provide controlled environments for instrument testing and validation, are widely applied in the aerospace and biomedicine fields. However, traditional fixed calibration points fail to adapt to complex operational requirements and exhibit problems including a limited coverage range and low efficiency. To address these challenges, this study develops a Gaussian Process-based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization (GP-MFBO) framework for optimal selection of temperature and humidity calibration points. The framework integrates the following three key components: (1) a three-layer progressive multi-fidelity modeling system comprising physical analytical models, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulations, and experimental verification; (2) a systematic uncertainty quantification system covering model uncertainty, parameter uncertainty, and observation uncertainty; and (3) an adaptive acquisition function that balances uncertainty penalty mechanisms and multi-fidelity information gain evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed GP-MFBO method achieves optimal calibration point combinations with a temperature uniformity score of 0.149 and humidity uniformity score of 2.38, approaching theoretical optimal solutions within 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Compared to standard Gaussian process, Co-Kriging, two-stage optimization, polynomial regression, and traditional single-fidelity methods, GP-MFBO achieves uniformity score improvements of up to 81.7% and 76.3% for temperature and humidity, respectively. The prediction confidence interval coverage reaches 94.2%, outperforming all comparative methods. This research provides a rigorous theoretical foundation and technical solution for the scientific design and reliable operation of large-space temperature and humidity calibration systems.