ESErik R. Snell
Erik R. Snell
*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Erik R. Snell has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alaina N. Kuhn
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; and
1 shared publication - Brian Benitez
Department of Health Sciences, Human Advancement Through Translational Exercise Research Laboratory, Stetson University, Deland, Florida
1 shared publication - Clara J. Mitchinson
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; and
1 shared publication - Haley C. Bergstrom
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; and
1 shared publication - Minyoung Kwak
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; and
1 shared publication - Pasquale J. Succi
Center for Natural and Behavioral Sciences, Exercise Science, Chestnut Hill College, Philadelphia, PA 11918, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 19 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
- Vol. 10 (4) , 448
Test–Retest Reliability and Sex-Dependent Responses for Physiological and Perceptual Variables at Sub-Maximal Thresholds
Background: Fatigue thresholds such as the gas exchange threshold (GET) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) describe unique physiological responses. This study investigated the reliability of, and sex-dependent responses for, the GET and RCP across absolute, relative, and normalized expressions of volume of oxygen consumption (O2), power output (PO), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Methods: A test–retest graded exercise test (GXT) protocol was conducted on healthy, recreationally trained males (n = 9) and females (n = 9) to determine the GET and RCP (O2). Linear regression was used to identify the PO, HR, and RPE at the GET and RCP. Separate 2 [test (1, 2)] × 2 [sex (male, female)] mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) examined systematic error across test and sex (p > 0.05). Separate reliability analyses were conducted for each variable for males and females using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), minimal differences (MDs), standard errors of measure (SEMs), and coefficients of variation (CVs). Results: Absolute and relative expression of PO and O2 at the GET and RCP reflected “excellent” relative reliability (R = 0.816–0.978) across sex. Absolute and normalized expression of HR and RPE at the GET and RCP demonstrated “good” to “poor” relative reliability (R= −0.093–0.886) across sex. The SEMs and MDs were relatively small with CVs at or below 10% across thresholds. Absolute PO and O2 for the GET and RCP were greater for males than females, while females demonstrated greater normalized RCP as well as absolute and normalized HR and RPE at the RCP. Conclusions: Although the relative reliability for HR and RPE at the GET and RCP was, in some cases, limited, these variables demonstrated acceptable absolute reliability and, therefore, have applicability to monitor and prescribe exercise intensities. Current exercise prescription techniques may neglect the unique sex-dependent perceptual and cardiovascular responses at the GET and RCP.- 19 November 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
- Vol. 10 (4) , 448
Open AccessTest–Retest Reliability and Sex-Dependent Responses for Physiological and Perceptual Variables at Sub-Maximal Thresholds
Background: Fatigue thresholds such as the gas exchange threshold (GET) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) describe unique physiological responses. This study investigated the reliability of, and sex-dependent responses for, the GET and RCP across absolute, relative, and normalized expressions of volume of oxygen consumption (O2), power output (PO), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Methods: A test–retest graded exercise test (GXT) protocol was conducted on healthy, recreationally trained males (n = 9) and females (n = 9) to determine the GET and RCP (O2). Linear regression was used to identify the PO, HR, and RPE at the GET and RCP. Separate 2 [test (1, 2)] × 2 [sex (male, female)] mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) examined systematic error across test and sex (p > 0.05). Separate reliability analyses were conducted for each variable for males and females using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), minimal differences (MDs), standard errors of measure (SEMs), and coefficients of variation (CVs). Results: Absolute and relative expression of PO and O2 at the GET and RCP reflected “excellent” relative reliability (R = 0.816–0.978) across sex. Absolute and normalized expression of HR and RPE at the GET and RCP demonstrated “good” to “poor” relative reliability (R= −0.093–0.886) across sex. The SEMs and MDs were relatively small with CVs at or below 10% across thresholds. Absolute PO and O2 for the GET and RCP were greater for males than females, while females demonstrated greater normalized RCP as well as absolute and normalized HR and RPE at the RCP. Conclusions: Although the relative reliability for HR and RPE at the GET and RCP was, in some cases, limited, these variables demonstrated acceptable absolute reliability and, therefore, have applicability to monitor and prescribe exercise intensities. Current exercise prescription techniques may neglect the unique sex-dependent perceptual and cardiovascular responses at the GET and RCP.