Christopher Holden

Background: Legalization of cannabis across several US states may increase its use by individuals on hemodialysis, particularly among those with chronic pain. Contemporary data on frequency or factors associated with cannabis use by this population are limited. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the HOPE Consortium Trial to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use in Hemodialysis, a randomized trial that tested whether a cognitive behavioral therapy intervention lowered pain interference in people with chronic pain receiving hemodialysis at 103 US dialysis facilities. We analyzed baseline demographic characteristics, social and medical history, pain intensity, pain interference, and cannabis use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations of baseline data with cannabis use. Linear regression was used to examine whether cannabis use modified the response to the intervention. Results: Among 643 participants, 102 (16%) reported current cannabis use, 133 (21%) reported former use, and 408 (63%) had never used. Current users were younger than never or past users combined (median age 54 vs. 63 years) and more likely to be disabled (79% vs. 66%), to have received dialysis for >5 years (40% vs. 30%), and to self-report depression (41% vs. 31%), anxiety (28% vs. 20%), or any psychological disorder (51% vs. 38%), and less likely to be married (16% vs. 34%). Current cigarette smoking (odds ratio [OR]=3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-6.46) and alcohol use (OR=2.82, 95% CI 1.37-5.80) were independently associated with cannabis use, as were age, relationship status, neighborhood segregation index, and cocaine/heroin use. Cannabis use did not modify response to the intervention. Conclusions: Current cannabis use was reported by 16% of HOPE participants and was more common among younger, unmarried individuals who use other substances , but did not alter response to our intervention. More research is needed on the consequences of cannabis use among people receiving hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE To determine the practical problems that families of children on home enteral tube feeds (HETF) experience in the first year post-hospital discharge. METHODS Thirty parents/carers of children (0-16 years) completed a multiple choice/short answer questionnaire by interview 12 months after discharge from hospital. Issues addressed included: home delivery of feed and equipment; pump usage; tube changes; and overnight feeding. The main problems identified were: sleep disturbance (75%); frequent tube dislodgement (46%); tube blockages (41%); inability of some home delivery companies (HDC) to provide all the paediatric special feeds required (43%); and pump inaccuracy (23%). Conclusions Children on long-term HETF and their families experience significant problems with sleep disturbance, tube dislodgement and tube blockage. In addition, accuracy of pumps and obtaining feed and equipment was a source of stress. Dietitians and community nurses urgently need to explore solutions to the common problems associated with overnight feeding. Furthermore, regular home reviews are necessary in long-term HETF to continue to identify and minimize problems.