Tulika Ranjan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Tulika Ranjan has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Arun Maharaj
Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
2 shared publications - Khalid Ahmad Qidwai
Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States
2 shared publications - Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia
Baptist Health South Florida
2 shared publications - Zouina Sarfraz
Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
2 shared publications - Khalis Mustafayev
Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
1 shared publication - Lydia Hodgson
Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Gaps in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Patients with Brain Tumors in the United States: A State-of-the-Art Review
Brain tumors, both malignant and non-malignant, represent a persistent global health challenge. Differences in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes are influenced by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and geographical location. Brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors rank 19th in global cancer incidence and 12th in cancer-related mortality. U.S. Incidence is higher in females and individuals with greater socioeconomic means, contrasting with global patterns where males are more affected. Glioblastoma has a wide variation in incidence and survival by state, with rural regions showing higher mortality despite lower incidence, often due to reduced access to specialized care. Non-Hispanic Black children with CNS tumors experience higher mortality than their White peers, even after adjusting for SES. Outcomes are generally poorer in low- and middle-income countries, where healthcare infrastructure remains limited. Biological and genetic differences may also influence treatment response and tumor behavior across population groups. This review outlines key variations in brain tumor care, with a key focus on the United States, and emphasizes the need for patient-centered strategies to ensure timely diagnosis, consistent treatment, and improved outcomes.
Open AccessGaps in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Patients with Brain Tumors in the United States: A State-of-the-Art Review
Brain tumors, both malignant and non-malignant, represent a persistent global health challenge. Differences in diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes are influenced by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and geographical location. Brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors rank 19th in global cancer incidence and 12th in cancer-related mortality. U.S. Incidence is higher in females and individuals with greater socioeconomic means, contrasting with global patterns where males are more affected. Glioblastoma has a wide variation in incidence and survival by state, with rural regions showing higher mortality despite lower incidence, often due to reduced access to specialized care. Non-Hispanic Black children with CNS tumors experience higher mortality than their White peers, even after adjusting for SES. Outcomes are generally poorer in low- and middle-income countries, where healthcare infrastructure remains limited. Biological and genetic differences may also influence treatment response and tumor behavior across population groups. This review outlines key variations in brain tumor care, with a key focus on the United States, and emphasizes the need for patient-centered strategies to ensure timely diagnosis, consistent treatment, and improved outcomes.
- Open Access
Survival Determinants and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: A U.S. National Analysis
Background/Objectives: Brain metastases (BM) are common in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and portend poor outcomes. Contemporary determinants of survival in the modern treatment era remain incompletely defined. We evaluated factors associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with SCLC and BM using a recent, nationally representative dataset. Methods: We identified adults diagnosed with SCLC and brain metastases between 2018 and 2020 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Demographic, clinical, treatment, and survival data were extracted for analysis. Unadjusted OS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models identified factors associated with mortality, with proportional hazards (PH) assessed using scaled Schoenfeld residuals. Complementary Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) modeling was performed to confirm robustness. Results: Of 62,671 SCLC cases, 11,074 (17.7%) had BM, including 32.6% with brain-only disease. Median overall survival (mOS) was 6.6 months (95% CI, 6.47–6.87); patients with brain-only disease had an mOS of 8.8 months (8.38–9.26), compared with 5.95 months (5.75–6.18) for those with concurrent extracranial metastases. In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 years (HR 1.13, p < 0.001) was associated with higher mortality, whereas female sex (HR 0.87, p < 0.001), Black (HR 0.88, p = 0.001), Asian (HR 0.80, p = 0.022), and Hispanic (HR 0.87, p = 0.008) patients had lower hazards. Worse outcomes were associated with public or no insurance, lower income, non-academic facilities, and extracranial metastases; educational attainment was not significant. Proportional hazards assumptions were largely met with minor deviations, and AFT modeling confirmed consistent results. Treatment modality remained independently associated with survival in both models. Conclusions: In this contemporary national cohort, survival among patients with SCLC and brain metastases was influenced by multiple clinical, sociodemographic, and treatment factors, including age, sex, insurance status, facility type, and extent of metastatic disease. Treatment modality remained an independent predictor of survival. These results provide updated real-world benchmarks and highlight the need for prospective studies to define optimal management strategies in this high-risk population.
Open AccessSurvival Determinants and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: A U.S. National Analysis
Background/Objectives: Brain metastases (BM) are common in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and portend poor outcomes. Contemporary determinants of survival in the modern treatment era remain incompletely defined. We evaluated factors associated with overall survival (OS) among patients with SCLC and BM using a recent, nationally representative dataset. Methods: We identified adults diagnosed with SCLC and brain metastases between 2018 and 2020 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Demographic, clinical, treatment, and survival data were extracted for analysis. Unadjusted OS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models identified factors associated with mortality, with proportional hazards (PH) assessed using scaled Schoenfeld residuals. Complementary Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) modeling was performed to confirm robustness. Results: Of 62,671 SCLC cases, 11,074 (17.7%) had BM, including 32.6% with brain-only disease. Median overall survival (mOS) was 6.6 months (95% CI, 6.47–6.87); patients with brain-only disease had an mOS of 8.8 months (8.38–9.26), compared with 5.95 months (5.75–6.18) for those with concurrent extracranial metastases. In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 years (HR 1.13, p < 0.001) was associated with higher mortality, whereas female sex (HR 0.87, p < 0.001), Black (HR 0.88, p = 0.001), Asian (HR 0.80, p = 0.022), and Hispanic (HR 0.87, p = 0.008) patients had lower hazards. Worse outcomes were associated with public or no insurance, lower income, non-academic facilities, and extracranial metastases; educational attainment was not significant. Proportional hazards assumptions were largely met with minor deviations, and AFT modeling confirmed consistent results. Treatment modality remained independently associated with survival in both models. Conclusions: In this contemporary national cohort, survival among patients with SCLC and brain metastases was influenced by multiple clinical, sociodemographic, and treatment factors, including age, sex, insurance status, facility type, and extent of metastatic disease. Treatment modality remained an independent predictor of survival. These results provide updated real-world benchmarks and highlight the need for prospective studies to define optimal management strategies in this high-risk population.