María Victoria Vieiro Medina
Research Subjects
María Victoria Vieiro Medina has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Carlos García Vásquez
Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena, Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publications - Fernando Neria
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publications - Laura Alonso Murillo
General and Digestive Surgery Department, Infanta Elena University Hospital, Avenida de los Reyes Católicos 21, Valdemoro-Madrid, 28342, Spain
2 shared publications - Marta de la Fuente Bartolomé
Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Infanta Elena University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publications - Santos Francisco Jiménez de Los Galanes Marchán
General and Digestive Surgery Department, Infanta Elena University Hospital, Avenida de los Reyes Católicos 21, Valdemoro-Madrid, 28342, Spain
2 shared publications - Victor Nieto Barros
Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Infanta Elena University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 9 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Hernia
- Vol. 30 (1) , 284
Primary Grynfeltt hernia: multimodal imaging and laparoscopic transabdominal repair
- 9 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Hernia
- Vol. 30 (1) , 284
Primary Grynfeltt hernia: multimodal imaging and laparoscopic transabdominal repair
- Open Access
- 14 April 2026
- Published by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
- Vol. 30 (2) , 165-177
Impact of three-dimensional hepatic models on oncological outcomes and survival after hepatectomy: Prognostic factor analysis in a retrospective cohort
María Victoria Vieiro Medina, Laura Alonso Murillo, Carlos Ernesto García Vasquez, Victor Nieto Barros, Marta de la Fuente Bartolomé, Fernando Neria, Santos Francisco Jiménez de los Galanes Marchán. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg -0001;0:. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.25-250
- 14 April 2026
- Published by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
- Vol. 30 (2) , 165-177
Open AccessImpact of three-dimensional hepatic models on oncological outcomes and survival after hepatectomy: Prognostic factor analysis in a retrospective cohort
María Victoria Vieiro Medina, Laura Alonso Murillo, Carlos Ernesto García Vasquez, Victor Nieto Barros, Marta de la Fuente Bartolomé, Fernando Neria, Santos Francisco Jiménez de los Galanes Marchán. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg -0001;0:. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.25-250
- Open Access
- 6 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (24) , 8659
Three-Dimensional Models in Hepatic Surgery: Clinical Outcomes A Single-Center Experience
Background: Hepatic resection requires precise knowledge of vascular anatomy and remnant liver volume to guarantee both safety and efficacy. Three-dimensional (3D) models, either virtual or printed, have been proposed as tools to optimize surgical planning, education, and intraoperative navigation. Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated the impact of 3D model utilization (virtual and printed), in 89 patients who underwent elective hepatectomy at Infanta Elena University Hospital (Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain) between May 2018 and May 2023. The implementation of 3D modeling began to be routinely implemented as of November 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those without 3D modeling (n = 40) and those with 3D modeling (n = 49). Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the 3D model group (median 175 mL vs. 262.5 mL; p < 0.001), with no statistically significant differences in operative time, complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification), length of hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis identified dyslipidemia, postoperative sodium delta, and postoperative increase in direct bilirubin as independent risk factors for complications, whereas albumin demonstrated a protective effect. Conclusions: Three-dimensional modeling improves anatomic orientation and reduces intraoperative blood loss, although it does not significantly modify classic perioperative outcomes. Its principal value appears to reside in preoperative planning and technical safety rather than direct clinical impact.
- 6 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (24) , 8659
Open AccessThree-Dimensional Models in Hepatic Surgery: Clinical Outcomes A Single-Center Experience
Background: Hepatic resection requires precise knowledge of vascular anatomy and remnant liver volume to guarantee both safety and efficacy. Three-dimensional (3D) models, either virtual or printed, have been proposed as tools to optimize surgical planning, education, and intraoperative navigation. Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated the impact of 3D model utilization (virtual and printed), in 89 patients who underwent elective hepatectomy at Infanta Elena University Hospital (Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain) between May 2018 and May 2023. The implementation of 3D modeling began to be routinely implemented as of November 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those without 3D modeling (n = 40) and those with 3D modeling (n = 49). Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the 3D model group (median 175 mL vs. 262.5 mL; p < 0.001), with no statistically significant differences in operative time, complication rate (Clavien–Dindo classification), length of hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis identified dyslipidemia, postoperative sodium delta, and postoperative increase in direct bilirubin as independent risk factors for complications, whereas albumin demonstrated a protective effect. Conclusions: Three-dimensional modeling improves anatomic orientation and reduces intraoperative blood loss, although it does not significantly modify classic perioperative outcomes. Its principal value appears to reside in preoperative planning and technical safety rather than direct clinical impact.