GPGiulia Platania

Giulia Platania

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Giulia Platania has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Alessandro Tozzi

    From the Neuroradiology Unit (G.C., G.P., B.M., L.C., G.B., F.T.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (G.C., M.L.), Università di Milano; Neuroradiology Unit (A.F.), Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori; Specialization School in Neurosurgery (A.T.), Università degli Studi di Milano; Neurosurgery Unit (G.F., M.L.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    1 shared publication
  • Alessandro Tozzi

    SC Radiologia Diagnostica per Immagini e Neuroradiologia Interventistica, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milan, Italy

    1 shared publication
  • Andrea Fontana

    From the Neuroradiology Unit (G.C., G.P., B.M., L.C., G.B., F.T.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (G.C., M.L.), Università di Milano; Neuroradiology Unit (A.F.), Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori; Specialization School in Neurosurgery (A.T.), Università degli Studi di Milano; Neurosurgery Unit (G.F., M.L.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    1 shared publication
  • Beatrice Modello

    From the Neuroradiology Unit (G.C., G.P., B.M., L.C., G.B., F.T.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (G.C., M.L.), Università di Milano; Neuroradiology Unit (A.F.), Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori; Specialization School in Neurosurgery (A.T.), Università degli Studi di Milano; Neurosurgery Unit (G.F., M.L.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    1 shared publication
  • Elisa Sala

    Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan

    1 shared publication
  • Emanuele Ferrante

    Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Intravenous VasoCT for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: Feasibility and Exploratory Correlation with DSA

    by Giorgio Conte, Giulia Platania, Beatrice Modello, Luca Caschera, Andrea Fontana, Alessandro Tozzi, Giorgio Fiore, Giulio Bertani, Marco Locatelli, Fabio Triulzi

    There is no consensus regarding the optimal imaging modality for assessing aneurysms treated with flow-diverters (FD). to evaluate the image quality of intravenous VasoCT (IV-VasoCT) in the follow-up of aneurysms treated with FD and to explore its potential for depicting braid stent deformation and vessel lumen modifications. we retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent FD placement for the treatment of aneurysms, with post-treatment IV-VasoCT at 1-3 months and DSA at least 6 months. IV-VasoCT image quality assessment evaluated: vessel opacification, vessel border, stent radiopacity, stent/vessel contrast, movement artefacts. Braid stent and parent vessel findings were compared between IV-VasoCT and DSA in terms of: neointimal lining, stent foreshortening, fish-mouthing, bumping, braid collapse. 26 aneurysms were evaluated in 24 patients (F/M: 15/9), with a median age of 54.5 years (IQR: 47.0-59.0 years). The in-consensus image quality reading evaluated: vessel opacification as optimal in 19 cases (73.1%), vessel borders as well-defined in 17 (65.4%); stent radiopacity as well-defined in 25 (96.2%), stent/vessel contrast as optimal in 20 (76.9%). Compared to DSA, IV-VasoCT diagnosed 2/3 (66%) cases of neointimal lining, 2/2 (100%) of fish-mouth, 1/2 (50%) of foreshortening, 3/6 (50%) of bumping, 2/2 (100%) of braid collapse. IV-VasoCT is feasible for the non-invasive follow-up of aneurysm treated with FD. It may depict modifications in braid stent and vessel neointimal lining, but the presence of coils may reduce its image quality because of artefacts.


  • Open Access

    Exploring the Role of Skull Base Anatomy in Surgical Approach Selection and Endocrinological Outcomes in Craniopharyngiomas

    by Alessandro Tozzi, Giorgio Fiore, Elisa Sala, Giulio Andrea Bertani, Stefano Borsa, Ilaria Carnicelli, Emanuele Ferrante, Giulia Platania, Giovanna Mantovani, Marco Locatelli

    Background/Objectives: Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are rare, generally benign tumors predominantly located in the sellar and suprasellar regions, associated with significant morbidity and complex surgical management. Despite high overall survival rates, patients frequently experience complications including visual impairment, pituitary dysfunction, diabetes insipidus (DI), and hypothalamic syndrome. Among these, hypothalamic obesity (HO) represents one of the most clinically challenging sequelae, often occurring early, lacking standardized medical treatment, and leading to substantial comorbidity and reduced quality of life. This study reports a single-center experience focusing on the relationship between skull base anatomy, surgical approach selection, and endocrinological outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with CPs who underwent surgery by a dedicated team at our Department from January 2014 to January 2024. The approaches used were endoscopic (ER) and transcranial (TR). Preoperative imaging (volumetric MRI and CT scans) was analyzed using 3DSlicer (open-source software) for anatomical modeling of the tumor and skull base. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through follow-up assessments by a team of neuroendocrinologists. Data on BMI changes, DI onset, and hypopituitarism were collected. Statistical analyses consisted of descriptive comparisons and exploratory regression models. Results: Of 18 patients reviewed, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Larger sphenoid sinus volumes were associated with selection of an endoscopic endonasal approach (p = 0.0351; AUC = 0.875). In ER cases, the osteotomy area was directly related to tumor volume, independent of other anatomical parameters. Postoperatively, a significant increase in BMI (22.39 vs. 26.65 kg/m2; p = 0.0049) and in the incidence of DI (three vs. nine cases; p-value 0.0272) was observed. No clear differential association between surgical approach and endocrinological outcomes emerged in this cohort. Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of skull base anatomy using 3D modeling may support surgical approach selection in patients with craniopharyngiomas, particularly in identifying anatomical settings favorable to endoscopic endonasal surgery. Endocrinological outcomes appeared more closely related to tumor characteristics and hypothalamic involvement than to the surgical route itself. These findings support the role of individualized, anatomy-informed surgical planning within a multidisciplinary framework.