KZKun Zhao

Kun Zhao

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Kun Zhao has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Jianyang Lin

    Department of General Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xiang Li

    Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xin Ding

    Department of General Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

    1 shared publication
  • Yinyan Wu

    Department of General Surgery, Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

    1 shared publication
  • Zhihong Chen

    The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Sichuan Institute for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, China-Cuba Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Neurotechnology and Brain-Apparatus Communication, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, P. R. China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Developing a competing risk nomogram that predicts the survival of patients with a primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor

    by Jianyang Lin, Xiang Li, Xin Ding, Zhihong Chen, Yinyan Wu, Kun Zhao

    Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor (PHNET) is rare liver cancer and related prognostic factors are unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic risk factors of patients with PHNETs and establish an assessment model for prognosis. The clinical information of 539 patients with PHNETs who met the criteria for inclusion was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. These patients were randomly assigned to the training (269 cases) and validation sets (270 cases). Prognostic factors in patients with PHNETs were screened using the Cox proportional regression model and Fine–Gray competing risk model. Based on the training set analysis using the Fine–Gray competing risk model, a nomogram was constructed to predict cumulative probabilities for PHNET-specific death. The performance of the nomogram was measured by using receiver operating characteristic curves, the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). No differences in clinical baseline characteristics between the training and validation sets were observed, and the Fine–Gray analysis showed that surgery and more than one primary malignancy were associated with a low cumulative probability of PHNET-specific death. The training set nomograms were well-calibrated and had good discriminative ability, and good agreement between predicted and observed survival was observed. Patients with PHNETs with a high-risk score had a significantly increased risk of PHNET-specific death and non-PHNET death. Surgical treatment and the number of primary malignancies were found to be independent protective factors for PHNETs. The competing risk nomogram has high accuracy in predicting disease-specific survival (DSS) for patients with PHNETs, which may help clinicians to develop individualized treatment strategies.