Bronwyn Sutherland
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Bronwyn Sutherland has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexander Paterson-Roberts
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX
1 shared publication - Alexandra B. Caloudas
VHA Office of Rural Health Veterans Rural Health Resource Center‐Salt Lake City (VRHRC‐SLC) Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health Care System Salt Lake City Utah USA
1 shared publication - Bradley Vincent Watts
Veterans Rural Health Resource Center Veterans Affairs Medical Center White River Junction Vermont USA
1 shared publication - Hilary Touchett
Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
1 shared publication - Kelley Arredondo
Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, USA
1 shared publication - Laura Witte
Veterans Affairs, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 August 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 64 (1S) , S18-S25
Strengthening Rural Health Care
Background: Despite nursing being the largest US health profession, only 16% of registered nurses (RNs) practice in rural areas, where health care access is limited. This significantly impacts rural residents, including over 2.7 million rural veterans receiving care at the Veterans Health Administration, leading to compromised health outcomes. Nurses are vital in primary care, improving coordination and management of chronic conditions. Objectives: Identify recruitment and retention programs for rural nurses (licensed vocational nurses/licensed practical nurses and RNs), including strategy characteristics and location. Research Design: We conducted a scoping review of published and gray literature. Eligible studies targeted US rural nurse recruitment and retention strategies. Measures: Data were extracted for program characteristics, including strategy type (eg, financial incentive), focus (recruitment, retention, or both), and collaboration levels (single or multi-institutional). Results: Of 1179 unique articles identified, only 60 met the inclusion criteria. An additional 42 programs were identified from gray literature, totaling 102 programs. Twenty-two programs used a multipronged approach (2–14 strategies), totaling 180 strategies. Education (n=85) and personal and professional support (n=54) were the most frequently used recruitment and retention strategies. Conclusions: Of the 102 programs, only 22 used a multipronged approach, with education as the most frequently used strategy. More programs should use a multipronged approach and provide additional incentives and support (eg, financial incentives) to rural nurses beyond education. Only 4 strategies were regulatory, shedding light on the need for more nurse recruitment and retention support at the policy level.
- 25 August 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 64 (1S) , S18-S25
Strengthening Rural Health Care
Background: Despite nursing being the largest US health profession, only 16% of registered nurses (RNs) practice in rural areas, where health care access is limited. This significantly impacts rural residents, including over 2.7 million rural veterans receiving care at the Veterans Health Administration, leading to compromised health outcomes. Nurses are vital in primary care, improving coordination and management of chronic conditions. Objectives: Identify recruitment and retention programs for rural nurses (licensed vocational nurses/licensed practical nurses and RNs), including strategy characteristics and location. Research Design: We conducted a scoping review of published and gray literature. Eligible studies targeted US rural nurse recruitment and retention strategies. Measures: Data were extracted for program characteristics, including strategy type (eg, financial incentive), focus (recruitment, retention, or both), and collaboration levels (single or multi-institutional). Results: Of 1179 unique articles identified, only 60 met the inclusion criteria. An additional 42 programs were identified from gray literature, totaling 102 programs. Twenty-two programs used a multipronged approach (2–14 strategies), totaling 180 strategies. Education (n=85) and personal and professional support (n=54) were the most frequently used recruitment and retention strategies. Conclusions: Of the 102 programs, only 22 used a multipronged approach, with education as the most frequently used strategy. More programs should use a multipronged approach and provide additional incentives and support (eg, financial incentives) to rural nurses beyond education. Only 4 strategies were regulatory, shedding light on the need for more nurse recruitment and retention support at the policy level.