Ziyi Zan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Ziyi Zan has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Changming Cao
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 shared publications - Kun Wang
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 shared publications - Weifeng Yue
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 shared publications - Xinli Hu
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 shared publications - Hangzheng Zhao
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
1 shared publication - Lingming Su
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (1) , 101
High-Accuracy Identification of Cropping Structure in Irrigation Districts Using Data Fusion and Machine Learning
Persistent cloud cover during the growing season and mosaic cropping patterns introduce temporal gaps and mixed pixels, undermining the reliability of large-scale crop identification and acreage statistics. To address these issues, we develop a high spatiotemporal-resolution remote-sensing approach tailored to heterogeneous farmlands. First, an improved Spatiotemporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM) is used to fuse Landsat, Sentinel-2, and MODIS observations, reconstructing a continuous Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time series at 30 m spatial and 8-day temporal resolution. Second, at the field scale, we derive phenological descriptors from the reconstructed series—key phenophase timing, amplitude, temporal trend, and growth rate—and use a Random Forest (RF) classifier for detailed crop discrimination. We further integrate SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each feature’s class-discriminative contribution and signed effect, thereby guiding feature-set optimization and threshold refinement. Finally, we generate a 2024 crop distribution map and conduct comparative evaluations. Relative to baselines without fusion or without phenological variables, the fused series mitigates single-sensor limitations under frequent cloud/rain and irregular acquisitions, enhances NDVI continuity and robustness, and reveals inter-crop temporal phase shifts that, when jointly exploited, reduce early-season confusion and improve identification accuracy. Independent validation yields an overall accuracy (OA) of 90.78% and a Cohen’s kappa(κ) coefficient of 0.882. Coupling dense NDVI reconstruction with phenology-aware constraints and SHAP-based interpretability demonstrably improves the accuracy and reliability of cropping-structure extraction in complex agricultural regions and provides a reusable pathway for regional-scale precision agricultural monitoring.
- 27 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 18 (1) , 101
Open AccessHigh-Accuracy Identification of Cropping Structure in Irrigation Districts Using Data Fusion and Machine Learning
Persistent cloud cover during the growing season and mosaic cropping patterns introduce temporal gaps and mixed pixels, undermining the reliability of large-scale crop identification and acreage statistics. To address these issues, we develop a high spatiotemporal-resolution remote-sensing approach tailored to heterogeneous farmlands. First, an improved Spatiotemporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM) is used to fuse Landsat, Sentinel-2, and MODIS observations, reconstructing a continuous Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time series at 30 m spatial and 8-day temporal resolution. Second, at the field scale, we derive phenological descriptors from the reconstructed series—key phenophase timing, amplitude, temporal trend, and growth rate—and use a Random Forest (RF) classifier for detailed crop discrimination. We further integrate SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each feature’s class-discriminative contribution and signed effect, thereby guiding feature-set optimization and threshold refinement. Finally, we generate a 2024 crop distribution map and conduct comparative evaluations. Relative to baselines without fusion or without phenological variables, the fused series mitigates single-sensor limitations under frequent cloud/rain and irregular acquisitions, enhances NDVI continuity and robustness, and reveals inter-crop temporal phase shifts that, when jointly exploited, reduce early-season confusion and improve identification accuracy. Independent validation yields an overall accuracy (OA) of 90.78% and a Cohen’s kappa(κ) coefficient of 0.882. Coupling dense NDVI reconstruction with phenology-aware constraints and SHAP-based interpretability demonstrably improves the accuracy and reliability of cropping-structure extraction in complex agricultural regions and provides a reusable pathway for regional-scale precision agricultural monitoring.
- Open Access
- 11 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 15 (24) , 2563
Quantifying Dynamic Water-Saving Thresholds Through Regulating Irrigation: Insights from an Integrated Hydrological Model of the Hetao Irrigation District
Agricultural irrigation accounts for nearly 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, making sustainable water management crucial for food security and ecological stability—particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. However, dynamic water-saving thresholds at both inter-annual and intra-annual scales remain insufficiently quantified in current research. To address this gap, this study developed an integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model for the Hetao Irrigation District and quantified dynamic water-saving thresholds by simulating crop yield responses under a range of irrigation scenarios. The model was calibrated (2008–2014) and validated (2014–2016), demonstrating reliable performance (R2 = 0.75, NSE = 0.74) in capturing local hydrological processes. Inter-annual scenarios assessed water-saving levels of 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% under wet, normal, and dry years, while intra-annual scenarios adjusted seasonal irrigation volumes in spring, summer, and autumn with reduction gradients of 33%, 50%, and 100%. Results show that wet and normal years could achieve a water-saving threshold of up to 20%, whereas dry years were limited to 5%. Intra-annually, autumn irrigation offered the greatest saving potential (33–100%), followed by spring (33–50%). Spatially, crop responses varied substantially: the western part of the region proved particularly sensitive, with even the optimal district-wide strategy reducing local crop yields by 10–20%. This study quantifies dynamic water-saving thresholds and incorporates spatial heterogeneity into scenario assessment. The resulting framework is transferable and provides a basis for sustainable water management in water-limited agricultural regions.
- 11 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 15 (24) , 2563
Open AccessQuantifying Dynamic Water-Saving Thresholds Through Regulating Irrigation: Insights from an Integrated Hydrological Model of the Hetao Irrigation District
Agricultural irrigation accounts for nearly 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, making sustainable water management crucial for food security and ecological stability—particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. However, dynamic water-saving thresholds at both inter-annual and intra-annual scales remain insufficiently quantified in current research. To address this gap, this study developed an integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model for the Hetao Irrigation District and quantified dynamic water-saving thresholds by simulating crop yield responses under a range of irrigation scenarios. The model was calibrated (2008–2014) and validated (2014–2016), demonstrating reliable performance (R2 = 0.75, NSE = 0.74) in capturing local hydrological processes. Inter-annual scenarios assessed water-saving levels of 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% under wet, normal, and dry years, while intra-annual scenarios adjusted seasonal irrigation volumes in spring, summer, and autumn with reduction gradients of 33%, 50%, and 100%. Results show that wet and normal years could achieve a water-saving threshold of up to 20%, whereas dry years were limited to 5%. Intra-annually, autumn irrigation offered the greatest saving potential (33–100%), followed by spring (33–50%). Spatially, crop responses varied substantially: the western part of the region proved particularly sensitive, with even the optimal district-wide strategy reducing local crop yields by 10–20%. This study quantifies dynamic water-saving thresholds and incorporates spatial heterogeneity into scenario assessment. The resulting framework is transferable and provides a basis for sustainable water management in water-limited agricultural regions.