Guoquan Nie
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Guoquan Nie has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dengfa He
School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
1 shared publication - Guochen Mo
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR&GZAR/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication - Meng Zhang
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR&GZAR/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication - Qingyu Zhang
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR&GZAR/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication - Shaocong Ji
Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication - Xiaopan Li
Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR&GZAR/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin 541004, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Differential Karst Control of Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi, Sichuan Basin, SW China
The dolomite of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area of central Sichuan Basin is rich in hydrocarbon resources. It has experienced superimposition-reformation of multistage karstification, and is the key target for studying deep ancient carbonate reservoirs. Exploration and development practices show that there are great differences in the development of karst reservoirs of the fourth member of Dengying Formation between the platform margin and intraplatform in Gaoshiti-Moxi area. However, the differences in the genetic mechanism of karst reservoirs between these two zones are unclear. Therefore, based on an integrated analysis of core, thin section, drilling, logging, and geochemical test data, this study clarifies the differences in karstification between the platform margin and intraplatform and conducts a comparative analysis of the controlling factors for the differences in karst reservoirs. Results show that the fourth member of Dengying Formation experienced superimposition-reformation of four types of paleokarstification, including eogenetic meteoric water karst, supergene karst, coastal mixed water karst, and burial karst. Large-scale dissolved fractures and caves are mainly controlled by meteoric water karstification, primarily developing three types of reservoir space: vug type, fracture-vug type, and cave type. Dolomite and quartz fillings are mainly formed in the medium-deep burial period. Four types of paleokarstification are developed in the platform margin, while the coastal mixed water karst is not developed in the intraplatform. Eogenetic meteoric water karst and supergene karst in the platform margin are stronger than those in the intraplatform, while burial karst shows no notable difference between the two zones. The thickness of soluble rock (mound-shoal complex), karst paleogeomorphology, and different types of paleokarstification are the main controlling factors for the difference in karst reservoirs between the platform margin and the intraplatform.
Open AccessDifferential Karst Control of Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Fourth Member of Sinian Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi, Sichuan Basin, SW China
The dolomite of the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Gaoshiti-Moxi area of central Sichuan Basin is rich in hydrocarbon resources. It has experienced superimposition-reformation of multistage karstification, and is the key target for studying deep ancient carbonate reservoirs. Exploration and development practices show that there are great differences in the development of karst reservoirs of the fourth member of Dengying Formation between the platform margin and intraplatform in Gaoshiti-Moxi area. However, the differences in the genetic mechanism of karst reservoirs between these two zones are unclear. Therefore, based on an integrated analysis of core, thin section, drilling, logging, and geochemical test data, this study clarifies the differences in karstification between the platform margin and intraplatform and conducts a comparative analysis of the controlling factors for the differences in karst reservoirs. Results show that the fourth member of Dengying Formation experienced superimposition-reformation of four types of paleokarstification, including eogenetic meteoric water karst, supergene karst, coastal mixed water karst, and burial karst. Large-scale dissolved fractures and caves are mainly controlled by meteoric water karstification, primarily developing three types of reservoir space: vug type, fracture-vug type, and cave type. Dolomite and quartz fillings are mainly formed in the medium-deep burial period. Four types of paleokarstification are developed in the platform margin, while the coastal mixed water karst is not developed in the intraplatform. Eogenetic meteoric water karst and supergene karst in the platform margin are stronger than those in the intraplatform, while burial karst shows no notable difference between the two zones. The thickness of soluble rock (mound-shoal complex), karst paleogeomorphology, and different types of paleokarstification are the main controlling factors for the difference in karst reservoirs between the platform margin and the intraplatform.