Bingyang Yang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Bingyang Yang has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chao Duan
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
1 shared publication - Conglin Wang
Nanshan Mining Company Ltd., Anhui Maanshan Iron and Steel Mining Resources Group, Maanshan 243000, China
1 shared publication - Jiaxin Zhang
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
1 shared publication - Kejun Hou
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
1 shared publication - Shunda Yuan
School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
1 shared publication - Xiaowei Gao
MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Trace Element Characteristics of Magnetite and Hematite from the Heshangqiao Iron Oxide–Apatite Deposit in Eastern China: Implications for the Ore-Forming Processes
Iron oxide–apatite (IOA) deposits are important for the global supply of iron resources. Currently, there is considerable debate regarding the evolution of their mineralization mechanisms. The Heshangqiao iron deposit is a significant IOA deposit situated within the Ningwu ore district of the Middle–Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt in China. This deposit exhibits distinct characteristics of multi-stage mineralization, forming disseminated ores, brecciated ores, and vein-type ores, from early to late stages. This study undertook a systematic elemental analysis of the magnetite and hematite from three mineralization stages of the Heshangqiao deposit. In the three mineralization stages of the Heshangqiao deposit, the elemental genesis indicators of ore genesis suggest that the hematite and magnetite both have magmatic hydrothermal genesis, characterized by high Ti and low Mg/Al and relatively high Ti and low Ni/Cr, respectively. The Cr and Sn contents of magnetite and hematite exhibit similar variation from the first to third mineralization stage, with an increase followed by a subsequent decrease. Meanwhile, the contents of V, Co, Ni, and Mn in magnetite and hematite exhibited an opposite trend, declining from the first to the second stage but eventually increasing from the second to the third stage. These changes in the genesis indicator also suggest that the multiple mineralization stages of the Heshangqiao deposit are independent of one another. The replacement of magnetite by hematite in each mineralization stage is not caused by the superposition of subsequent fluids, but rather by the residual fluid. It is noted that in the replacement the elements Cr, Co, and Ga were minimally migrated. These elements remained relatively stable and can be considered new potential discriminant indicators for the genesis of iron oxides.
Open AccessTrace Element Characteristics of Magnetite and Hematite from the Heshangqiao Iron Oxide–Apatite Deposit in Eastern China: Implications for the Ore-Forming Processes
Iron oxide–apatite (IOA) deposits are important for the global supply of iron resources. Currently, there is considerable debate regarding the evolution of their mineralization mechanisms. The Heshangqiao iron deposit is a significant IOA deposit situated within the Ningwu ore district of the Middle–Lower Yangtze River Metallogenic Belt in China. This deposit exhibits distinct characteristics of multi-stage mineralization, forming disseminated ores, brecciated ores, and vein-type ores, from early to late stages. This study undertook a systematic elemental analysis of the magnetite and hematite from three mineralization stages of the Heshangqiao deposit. In the three mineralization stages of the Heshangqiao deposit, the elemental genesis indicators of ore genesis suggest that the hematite and magnetite both have magmatic hydrothermal genesis, characterized by high Ti and low Mg/Al and relatively high Ti and low Ni/Cr, respectively. The Cr and Sn contents of magnetite and hematite exhibit similar variation from the first to third mineralization stage, with an increase followed by a subsequent decrease. Meanwhile, the contents of V, Co, Ni, and Mn in magnetite and hematite exhibited an opposite trend, declining from the first to the second stage but eventually increasing from the second to the third stage. These changes in the genesis indicator also suggest that the multiple mineralization stages of the Heshangqiao deposit are independent of one another. The replacement of magnetite by hematite in each mineralization stage is not caused by the superposition of subsequent fluids, but rather by the residual fluid. It is noted that in the replacement the elements Cr, Co, and Ga were minimally migrated. These elements remained relatively stable and can be considered new potential discriminant indicators for the genesis of iron oxides.