SYSatoshi Yamashita

Satoshi Yamashita

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Satoshi Yamashita has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Treatment Optimization with Add-On Kampo Therapy in Highly Refractory Migraine Patients with Inadequate Response or Re-Worsening During CGRP Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: A Real-World Treatment Episode Analysis

    by Takafumi Tanei, Satoshi Yamashita, Satoshi Maesawa, Tomotaka Ishizaki, Takahiro Suzuki, Shun Yamamoto, Satoshi Shinoda, Toshihiko Wakabayashi, Ryuta Saito

    Background/Objectives: Although calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) have improved migraine prevention, some patients continue to experience inadequate response or re-worsening during treatment. This study evaluated the effectiveness of add-on Kampo therapy in migraine patients receiving CGRP-mAb treatment. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 39 migraine patients who received add-on Kampo therapy during ongoing CGRP-mAb treatment, contributing 55 treatment episodes. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly headache days (MHD) from baseline to 1 month after Kampo initiation. Secondary outcomes included migraine frequency, headache-related disability, quality of life, acute medication use, and work productivity. A responder was defined as achieving a ≥30% reduction in MHD at 1 month. Results: The study population was highly refractory, with chronic migraine present in 79.5% of patients and medication-overuse headache in 56.4%. Among treatment episodes, 72.7% experienced re-worsening after an initial response to CGRP-mAb treatment. Median MHD was 14.0 days after CGRP-mAb treatment and subsequently increased to 16.0 days before Kampo initiation. After Kampo initiation, median MHD decreased to 10.0 days at 1 month. Significant improvements were also observed at 1 month in headache-related disability, quality of life, acute medication use, and presenteeism. The ≥30% and ≥50% responder rates at 1 month were 41.8% and 12.7%, respectively. Re-worsening after an initial CGRP-mAb response showed an exploratory association with treatment response in the Firth penalized logistic regression model. Conclusions: Add-on Kampo therapy was associated with improvements in headache burden, quality of life, acute medication use, and work productivity in patients with inadequate response or re-worsening during CGRP-mAb treatment. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest a potential role for add-on Kampo therapy as a treatment optimization strategy and warrant confirmation in prospective controlled studies.

  • Open Access

    Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Rimegepant as Second- or Third-Line Acute Treatment for Migraine: A Prospective Observational Study

    by Takafumi Tanei, Satoshi Yamashita, Shun Yamamoto, Shinsuke Muraoka, Tomotaka Ishizaki, Takahiro Suzuki, Satoshi Shinoda, Toshihiko Wakabayashi, Ryuta Saito


  • Open Access

    Continuation, Resumption, and Withdrawal Rates of CGRP-mAb Treatment for Migraine Under Real-World Clinical Conditions in Which Patients Are Free to Choose Own Treatment

    by Takafumi Tanei, Satoshi Yamashita, Satoshi Maesawa, Yusuke Nishimura, Tomotaka Ishizaki, Yoshitaka Nagashima, Takahiro Suzuki, Hajime Hamasaki, Shun Yamamoto, Toshihiko Wakabayashi, et al.

    Background/Objectives: Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) are effective injectable medications for the treatment of migraine. This study aimed to evaluate continuation, resumption, and withdrawal rates of CGRP-mAb treatment under real-world clinical conditions. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with at least 3 months of follow-up after starting CGRP-mAb treatment were included. The decision to continue, discontinue, or resume CGRP-mAb treatment was made freely by the patients. Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) were administered before starting treatment and one month after each CGRP-mAb injection. The endpoints were as follows: continuation rates of CGRP-mAb treatment after treatment initiation; resumption rate; withdrawal rate; changes in HIT-6 and MSQ scores; and differences in background factors between the resumption and withdrawal groups. Results: Of the 1162 migraine patients, 146 were included in the analysis. Continuation rates of CGRP-mAb treatment at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months were 93.2%, 80.2%, 68.9%, 58.8%, 55.4%, and 51.7%, respectively. For the patients who discontinued, the resumption rate was 76.8%, and the withdrawal rate was 20.7%. HIT-6 and MSQ scores were significantly decreased at all assessment points compared with before CGRP-mAb treatment. There were no significant differences in factors between the resumption and withdrawal groups. Conclusions: Under real-world clinical conditions in which patients were free to choose their own treatment, the continuation rate of CGRP-mAb treatment 12 months after treatment initiation was 58.8%, and more than half of patients remained on treatment after 24 months. The resumption rate was 76.8% and the withdrawal rate was 20.7%.