Zhibo Yang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Zhibo Yang has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Lingping Zhao
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luolong District, Kaiyuan Avenue, No. 263, Luoyang 471023, China
2 shared publications - Pei Mao
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luolong District, Kaiyuan Avenue, No. 263, Luoyang 471023, China
2 shared publications - Qunying Wang
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luolong District, Kaiyuan Avenue, No. 263, Luoyang 471023, China
2 shared publications - Shitu Tan
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luolong District, Kaiyuan Avenue, No. 263, Luoyang 471023, China
2 shared publications - Wenfeng Ma
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luolong District, Kaiyuan Avenue, No. 263, Luoyang 471023, China
2 shared publications - Wanqiao Zhang
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luolong District, Kaiyuan Avenue, No. 263, Luoyang 471023, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Differential Effects of Polyethylene and Polystyrene Microplastics on the Composition and Functional Attributes of the Oat (Avena sativa L.) Rhizosphere Microbiome
Microplastics (MPs) are increasingly accumulating in agricultural soils, while their effects on crop-associated rhizosphere microbial communities and ecological functions remain insufficiently understood, particularly for different polymer types. In this study, polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microplastics with the same particle size (2 μm) were applied at different concentrations (0, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 5%, w/w) to investigate their effects on oat rhizosphere bacterial communities and predicted functional potentials. The results showed that microplastic addition significantly altered bacterial community diversity, composition, and predicted functional profiles. Compared to the control (Ctrl), the 1% PE treatment significantly reduced bacterial richness-related indices (p < 0.05), whereas PS mainly affected bacterial diversity. Microplastic treatments also reshaped dominant bacterial taxa and altered the predicted functional potentials associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling. In particular, the 1% PE treatment significantly reduced the predicted relative abundance of the carbon fixation-related gene cbbL (p < 0.05). In addition, high-concentration (5%) PE enhanced several predicted functional potentials related to nitrogen cycling, including nifH, ureA, and amoC. Overall, PE and PS microplastics induced polymer- and concentration-dependent changes in oat rhizosphere bacterial communities. These findings suggest that microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils may influence ecosystem processes by modifying microbial diversity and potential biogeochemical functions. This study provides new insights into the ecological consequences of different microplastic polymers in crop rhizosphere ecosystems and highlights the importance of considering polymer-specific effects when evaluating soil microplastic pollution.
Open AccessDifferential Effects of Polyethylene and Polystyrene Microplastics on the Composition and Functional Attributes of the Oat (Avena sativa L.) Rhizosphere Microbiome
Microplastics (MPs) are increasingly accumulating in agricultural soils, while their effects on crop-associated rhizosphere microbial communities and ecological functions remain insufficiently understood, particularly for different polymer types. In this study, polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microplastics with the same particle size (2 μm) were applied at different concentrations (0, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 5%, w/w) to investigate their effects on oat rhizosphere bacterial communities and predicted functional potentials. The results showed that microplastic addition significantly altered bacterial community diversity, composition, and predicted functional profiles. Compared to the control (Ctrl), the 1% PE treatment significantly reduced bacterial richness-related indices (p < 0.05), whereas PS mainly affected bacterial diversity. Microplastic treatments also reshaped dominant bacterial taxa and altered the predicted functional potentials associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling. In particular, the 1% PE treatment significantly reduced the predicted relative abundance of the carbon fixation-related gene cbbL (p < 0.05). In addition, high-concentration (5%) PE enhanced several predicted functional potentials related to nitrogen cycling, including nifH, ureA, and amoC. Overall, PE and PS microplastics induced polymer- and concentration-dependent changes in oat rhizosphere bacterial communities. These findings suggest that microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils may influence ecosystem processes by modifying microbial diversity and potential biogeochemical functions. This study provides new insights into the ecological consequences of different microplastic polymers in crop rhizosphere ecosystems and highlights the importance of considering polymer-specific effects when evaluating soil microplastic pollution.
- Open Access
Effects of Polyethylene and Polystyrene Microplastics on Oat (Avena sativa L.) Growth and Physiological Characteristics
Despite increasing environmental concerns, there are few studies on the potential effects of polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics on feed crops. The effects of polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microplastics with a diameter of 2 μm at different concentrations (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 5%) (w/w) on the growth and development of oats were analyzed in a pot experiment, with no microplastics added as the Control (Ctrl) group. The results showed that PS microplastics exhibited a spherical morphology, whereas PE microplastics displayed an irregular morphology. PE microplastics had an inhibitory effect on oat growth, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant enzyme activity, and this effect was concentration-dependent; specifically, the inhibitory intensity increased progressively as the concentration of PE microplastics rose. In contrast, treatments involving varying concentrations of PS microplastics elicited distinct effects on the physiological and biochemical parameters of oats. The 0.1% PS microplastics treatment significantly enhanced the net photosynthetic rate of oat leaves (by 14.0%), while the 5% PS microplastics treatment significantly reduced the seedling height (by 31.1%), the total chlorophyll content (by 34.6%), the transpiration rate (by 35.7%), the stomatal conductance (by 71.1%), and the intercellular CO2 concentration (by 43.1%). Furthermore, a significant decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity was observed in oats after the 5% PE microplastics treatment. The activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) decreased by 17.1%, 89.2% and 5.6%, respectively. At the same concentration (5%), PE microplastics exhibited a more pronounced inhibitory effect on oats compared to PS microplastics. In summary, this study demonstrates that microplastics impair photosynthesis and antioxidant capacity in oats, thereby inhibiting their normal growth and development. These findings provide a theoretical foundation and supporting data for further research into the toxicity of microplastics to oats.
Open AccessEffects of Polyethylene and Polystyrene Microplastics on Oat (Avena sativa L.) Growth and Physiological Characteristics
Despite increasing environmental concerns, there are few studies on the potential effects of polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics on feed crops. The effects of polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) microplastics with a diameter of 2 μm at different concentrations (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 5%) (w/w) on the growth and development of oats were analyzed in a pot experiment, with no microplastics added as the Control (Ctrl) group. The results showed that PS microplastics exhibited a spherical morphology, whereas PE microplastics displayed an irregular morphology. PE microplastics had an inhibitory effect on oat growth, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant enzyme activity, and this effect was concentration-dependent; specifically, the inhibitory intensity increased progressively as the concentration of PE microplastics rose. In contrast, treatments involving varying concentrations of PS microplastics elicited distinct effects on the physiological and biochemical parameters of oats. The 0.1% PS microplastics treatment significantly enhanced the net photosynthetic rate of oat leaves (by 14.0%), while the 5% PS microplastics treatment significantly reduced the seedling height (by 31.1%), the total chlorophyll content (by 34.6%), the transpiration rate (by 35.7%), the stomatal conductance (by 71.1%), and the intercellular CO2 concentration (by 43.1%). Furthermore, a significant decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity was observed in oats after the 5% PE microplastics treatment. The activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) decreased by 17.1%, 89.2% and 5.6%, respectively. At the same concentration (5%), PE microplastics exhibited a more pronounced inhibitory effect on oats compared to PS microplastics. In summary, this study demonstrates that microplastics impair photosynthesis and antioxidant capacity in oats, thereby inhibiting their normal growth and development. These findings provide a theoretical foundation and supporting data for further research into the toxicity of microplastics to oats.