Cesare Caruso
Research Subjects
Cesare Caruso has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Angelo Alessandro Marra
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Center of Excellence for Gastrointestinal and Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases, Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola Hospital, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Angelo Parello
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Carlo Ratto
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Center of Excellence for Gastrointestinal and Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases, Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola Hospital, Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Claudia Varrella
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Francesco Litta
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Mario Pagano
Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Ospedale Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in International Medical Education
- Vol. 5 (1) , 3
A Low-Cost, Do-It-Yourself Laparoscopic Simulator for Basic Surgery Training: Design, Assembly, and Pilot Validation
Background: Simulation-based laparoscopic training increasingly relies on portable, low-cost platforms that support home-based practice, but detailed descriptions of reproducible, do-it-yourself (DIY) trainers and their educational potential remain limited. Methods: We updated a low-budget laparoscopic simulator constructed from an inexpensive plastic container, wood components, a low-cost webcam, and plywood task pads modeled on Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) exercises. We then conducted informal qualitative usability testing in which 10 residents and 5 fellows from general surgery, gynecology, and urology used the simulator at home for one week and completed an eight-item feedback form plus free-text comments on assembly, ergonomics, realism, and educational value. Results: All participants successfully assembled and used the simulator; most described set-up as easy or intuitive, reported adequate image quality and lighting, and considered the platform useful for practicing depth perception, bimanual coordination, and cutting and suturing tasks. Feedback emphasized low cost, portability, and cross-specialty applicability, with only minor suggestions such as adjustable camera height or increased base weight. Conclusions: This DIY laparoscopic simulator could be assembled and used in a home-based setting, and trainees reported favorable usability and perceived educational value. More structured validation studies addressing face, content, and construct validity are needed to define its potential role within contemporary surgical curricula.
- 25 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in International Medical Education
- Vol. 5 (1) , 3
Open AccessA Low-Cost, Do-It-Yourself Laparoscopic Simulator for Basic Surgery Training: Design, Assembly, and Pilot Validation
Background: Simulation-based laparoscopic training increasingly relies on portable, low-cost platforms that support home-based practice, but detailed descriptions of reproducible, do-it-yourself (DIY) trainers and their educational potential remain limited. Methods: We updated a low-budget laparoscopic simulator constructed from an inexpensive plastic container, wood components, a low-cost webcam, and plywood task pads modeled on Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) exercises. We then conducted informal qualitative usability testing in which 10 residents and 5 fellows from general surgery, gynecology, and urology used the simulator at home for one week and completed an eight-item feedback form plus free-text comments on assembly, ergonomics, realism, and educational value. Results: All participants successfully assembled and used the simulator; most described set-up as easy or intuitive, reported adequate image quality and lighting, and considered the platform useful for practicing depth perception, bimanual coordination, and cutting and suturing tasks. Feedback emphasized low cost, portability, and cross-specialty applicability, with only minor suggestions such as adjustable camera height or increased base weight. Conclusions: This DIY laparoscopic simulator could be assembled and used in a home-based setting, and trainees reported favorable usability and perceived educational value. More structured validation studies addressing face, content, and construct validity are needed to define its potential role within contemporary surgical curricula.