Nandan Mbbs Patel
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Nandan Mbbs Patel has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ali Saad Al-Shammari
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine University of Baghdad Baghdad Iraq
1 shared publication Faizan Ahmed
Department of Cardiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
1 shared publication- Hritvik Jain
Department of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital (AGH), Pittsburgh, PA
1 shared publication - Jyoti Mbbs Jain
Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India
1 shared publication - Muhammad Daoud Tariq
Department of Internal Medicine Foundation University Medical College Islamabad Pakistan
1 shared publication - Raheel Ahmed
Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 May 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Therapeutics
- Vol. 33 (1) , e31-e38
Continued Versus Interrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
Introduction: A substantial number of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) require long-term oral anticoagulants (OAC) owing to comorbidities. This study examined whether continuing oral anticoagulation periprocedurally during TAVR is as safe and effective as interrupting it. Methods: A systematic search of the major databases was performed to identify relevant studies. Effect estimates were calculated using risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs by pooling the data using the inverse-variance random effects model. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Four studies were included, with 2962 patients undergoing TAVR with continued OAC (n = 1318) and interrupted OAC (n = 1644). The pooled analysis demonstrated that TAVR with continued OAC had comparable risks for all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62–1.34; P = 0.64), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.43–1.84; P = 0.76), stroke (RR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42–1.08; P = 0.09), closure device failure (RR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.47–1.59; P = 0.64), major/life-threatening bleeding (RR: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.74–1.15; P = 0.49), and major vascular complications (RR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79–1.20; P = 0.80) compared with TAVR with interrupted OAC. Conclusions: In patients undergoing TAVR, continued OAC showed comparable safety and efficacy with interrupted OAC. These findings demonstrate that continuing OAC in the periprocedural period may be a viable option in patients with atrial fibrillation because of comorbidities requiring anticoagulants.
- 21 May 2025
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Therapeutics
- Vol. 33 (1) , e31-e38
Open AccessContinued Versus Interrupted Oral Anticoagulation During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
Introduction: A substantial number of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) require long-term oral anticoagulants (OAC) owing to comorbidities. This study examined whether continuing oral anticoagulation periprocedurally during TAVR is as safe and effective as interrupting it. Methods: A systematic search of the major databases was performed to identify relevant studies. Effect estimates were calculated using risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs by pooling the data using the inverse-variance random effects model. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Four studies were included, with 2962 patients undergoing TAVR with continued OAC (n = 1318) and interrupted OAC (n = 1644). The pooled analysis demonstrated that TAVR with continued OAC had comparable risks for all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.62–1.34; P = 0.64), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.43–1.84; P = 0.76), stroke (RR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42–1.08; P = 0.09), closure device failure (RR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.47–1.59; P = 0.64), major/life-threatening bleeding (RR: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.74–1.15; P = 0.49), and major vascular complications (RR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79–1.20; P = 0.80) compared with TAVR with interrupted OAC. Conclusions: In patients undergoing TAVR, continued OAC showed comparable safety and efficacy with interrupted OAC. These findings demonstrate that continuing OAC in the periprocedural period may be a viable option in patients with atrial fibrillation because of comorbidities requiring anticoagulants.