Samantha Morgillo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Samantha Morgillo has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anna Lene Seidler
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany
2 shared publications - Brittany J. Johnson
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, Australia
2 shared publications - Georgia Middleton
Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia
2 shared publications - Kylie Elizabeth Hunter
National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2 shared publications - Lua Perimal-Lewis
Flinders University College of Science and Engineering Bedford Park Australia
2 shared publications - Rebecca Anne Perry
Health Translation SA Adelaide Australia
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 August 2026
- Published by Wiley in Health Promotion Journal of Australia
- Vol. 37 (4) , e70230
Supporting Decision Making in Early Years Initiatives: Co‐Designing a Child Health Evidence Dashboard
Issue Addressed: Research has trialled many initiatives to support caregivers to shape young children's health behaviours. However, translating evidence to public health practice and policy is a challenge, in part due to access to such evidence. We aimed to co‐design a child health evidence dashboard, and to understand the expected enablers and barriers to use of the dashboard with next‐users (e.g., Australian child service managers, program planners). Methods: Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, we conducted a mixed‐methods study involving five online co‐design workshops. Next‐users were invited to participate in the workshops and completed pre‐ and post‐workshop surveys. Pragmatic data analysis occurred after each workshop to identify next‐user requirements and inform iterative dashboard development alongside workshops. Results: 15 next‐users participated in the workshop series (median of 9 per workshop). Next‐user preferences were categorised into desired uses, content, features and functionality, and design for the dashboard. Key enablers to use of the dashboard included relevance, promotion and credibility of the dashboard, positive user experience, time and resources to support use of the dashboard. Conclusions: We identified what and how next‐users want evidence on child health initiatives to inform policy and practice. Findings enabled development of an initial evidence dashboard prototype informed by next‐user preferences. Understanding the enablers and barriers to using and engaging with the dashboard will inform ongoing development and implementation.
- 11 August 2026
- Published by Wiley in Health Promotion Journal of Australia
- Vol. 37 (4) , e70230
Open AccessSupporting Decision Making in Early Years Initiatives: Co‐Designing a Child Health Evidence Dashboard
Issue Addressed: Research has trialled many initiatives to support caregivers to shape young children's health behaviours. However, translating evidence to public health practice and policy is a challenge, in part due to access to such evidence. We aimed to co‐design a child health evidence dashboard, and to understand the expected enablers and barriers to use of the dashboard with next‐users (e.g., Australian child service managers, program planners). Methods: Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, we conducted a mixed‐methods study involving five online co‐design workshops. Next‐users were invited to participate in the workshops and completed pre‐ and post‐workshop surveys. Pragmatic data analysis occurred after each workshop to identify next‐user requirements and inform iterative dashboard development alongside workshops. Results: 15 next‐users participated in the workshop series (median of 9 per workshop). Next‐user preferences were categorised into desired uses, content, features and functionality, and design for the dashboard. Key enablers to use of the dashboard included relevance, promotion and credibility of the dashboard, positive user experience, time and resources to support use of the dashboard. Conclusions: We identified what and how next‐users want evidence on child health initiatives to inform policy and practice. Findings enabled development of an initial evidence dashboard prototype informed by next‐user preferences. Understanding the enablers and barriers to using and engaging with the dashboard will inform ongoing development and implementation.
- Open Access
- 8 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 50 (1) , 100309
From evidence synthesis to practical tools: Next-user needs for an implementation-ready evidence base to prevent obesity in young children
- 8 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 50 (1) , 100309
Open AccessFrom evidence synthesis to practical tools: Next-user needs for an implementation-ready evidence base to prevent obesity in young children