Luis Angel Mendoza Rueda
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Luis Angel Mendoza Rueda has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adrián Jesús Santoyo Rojas
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
1 shared publication - Ericka Johanna Linzan Cedeño
Universidad Tecnica de Manabi
1 shared publication - Gerardo Uriel Viquez Burboa
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
1 shared publication - Juan David Leal Serrano
Fundación Universitaria Sanitas
1 shared publication - Karla Leslie Martínez Hernández
Universidad Anáhuac México
1 shared publication - Patricio Sebastian Ordóñez Montalvo
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 December 2025
- Published by Quality Consulting Instituto de Educación Capacitación y Certificación de México in IECCMEXICO
- Vol. 4 (3)
The Skin as a Diagnostic Window: Cutaneous Clues in the Early Recognition of Systemic Disease
The skin frequently reflects internal pathological processes, making cutaneous manifestations valuable indicators of systemic disease. This narrative integrative review analyzes current scientific evidence on dermatologic findings that function as early or concurrent markers of underlying systemic disorders. The study synthesizes peer-reviewed literature addressing renal–metabolic, inflammatory–immune, malignancy-related, and vascular–calcific conditions, emphasizing recognizable cutaneous patterns and their clinical context. Results demonstrate that paraneoplastic dermatoses are commonly described as early indicators that may precede the diagnosis of internal malignancy, whereas renal–metabolic and vascular–calcific manifestations are more frequently reported as concurrent expressions of established systemic disease. Inflammatory and immune-mediated dermatoses exhibit variable timing, reflecting heterogeneous triggers and systemic associations. Across categories, cutaneous findings consistently mirror immune dysregulation, metabolic imbalance, vascular injury, or neoplastic activity. This review highlights the diagnostic and educational relevance of dermatologic examination in general medical practice, particularly in settings where access to advanced diagnostic resources may be limited. Integrating systematic skin assessment into routine clinical evaluation can strengthen diagnostic reasoning, support earlier recognition of systemic illness, and promote a more holistic approach to patient care.
- 27 December 2025
- Published by Quality Consulting Instituto de Educación Capacitación y Certificación de México in IECCMEXICO
- Vol. 4 (3)
Open AccessThe Skin as a Diagnostic Window: Cutaneous Clues in the Early Recognition of Systemic Disease
The skin frequently reflects internal pathological processes, making cutaneous manifestations valuable indicators of systemic disease. This narrative integrative review analyzes current scientific evidence on dermatologic findings that function as early or concurrent markers of underlying systemic disorders. The study synthesizes peer-reviewed literature addressing renal–metabolic, inflammatory–immune, malignancy-related, and vascular–calcific conditions, emphasizing recognizable cutaneous patterns and their clinical context. Results demonstrate that paraneoplastic dermatoses are commonly described as early indicators that may precede the diagnosis of internal malignancy, whereas renal–metabolic and vascular–calcific manifestations are more frequently reported as concurrent expressions of established systemic disease. Inflammatory and immune-mediated dermatoses exhibit variable timing, reflecting heterogeneous triggers and systemic associations. Across categories, cutaneous findings consistently mirror immune dysregulation, metabolic imbalance, vascular injury, or neoplastic activity. This review highlights the diagnostic and educational relevance of dermatologic examination in general medical practice, particularly in settings where access to advanced diagnostic resources may be limited. Integrating systematic skin assessment into routine clinical evaluation can strengthen diagnostic reasoning, support earlier recognition of systemic illness, and promote a more holistic approach to patient care.