Salvatore Calcagno
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Salvatore Calcagno has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Emiliano Tramontana
Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
2 shared publications - Erika Scaletta
Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
2 shared publications - Gabriella Verga
Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
2 shared publications - Alessandro Midolo
Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Future Internet
- Vol. 18 (4) , 204
Detecting Objects in Aerial Imagery Using Drones and a YOLO-C3 Hybrid Approach
Drones have proven effective for acquiring aerial imagery, and when equipped with onboard analysis tools, they can automatically identify objects of interest. Neural-network methods for image analysis typically require large training datasets and substantial computational resources. By contrast, algorithmic techniques can detect objects using simple features, such as pixel colors, thereby reducing the need for extensive training and computational resources. Once trained, both types of system can analyze images in a short time. In our experiments, each approach has distinct strengths. The YOLO-based detector is more accurate for complex-shaped objects, such as trees, whereas the pixel-color approach performs better on sparser objects. This paper proposes YOLO-C3, a hybrid system designed for onboard drone image processing. By leveraging the strengths of both YOLO-based and pixel-based approaches, YOLO-C3 balances detection accuracy with estimation confidence. Trained on Mediterranean imagery dataset, the system is optimized for identifying natural objects, including citrus groves and trees. To assess the robustness of the image classifier, a K-fold cross-validation is performed. Compared to existing models, YOLO-C3 detects a wider range of natural objects with high accuracy and minimal latency, achieving a processing speed of 0.01 s per image. By performing object detection locally, drones can adapt their trajectories to support emergency response, helping to map safe corridors and locate buildings where people may be awaiting rescue after a natural disaster.
- 13 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Future Internet
- Vol. 18 (4) , 204
Open AccessDetecting Objects in Aerial Imagery Using Drones and a YOLO-C3 Hybrid Approach
Drones have proven effective for acquiring aerial imagery, and when equipped with onboard analysis tools, they can automatically identify objects of interest. Neural-network methods for image analysis typically require large training datasets and substantial computational resources. By contrast, algorithmic techniques can detect objects using simple features, such as pixel colors, thereby reducing the need for extensive training and computational resources. Once trained, both types of system can analyze images in a short time. In our experiments, each approach has distinct strengths. The YOLO-based detector is more accurate for complex-shaped objects, such as trees, whereas the pixel-color approach performs better on sparser objects. This paper proposes YOLO-C3, a hybrid system designed for onboard drone image processing. By leveraging the strengths of both YOLO-based and pixel-based approaches, YOLO-C3 balances detection accuracy with estimation confidence. Trained on Mediterranean imagery dataset, the system is optimized for identifying natural objects, including citrus groves and trees. To assess the robustness of the image classifier, a K-fold cross-validation is performed. Compared to existing models, YOLO-C3 detects a wider range of natural objects with high accuracy and minimal latency, achieving a processing speed of 0.01 s per image. By performing object detection locally, drones can adapt their trajectories to support emergency response, helping to map safe corridors and locate buildings where people may be awaiting rescue after a natural disaster.
- Open Access
- 1 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Future Internet
- Vol. 18 (2) , 77
Aerial Image Analysis: When LLMs Assist (And When Not)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable results when tasked with the analysis and production of texts or images and for captioning images. Aerial images differ from other images since they exhibit many natural objects that have a highly variable color range and no clear contours. This paper reports to what extent an LLM, i.e., Llama-4, can be tasked with the identification and captioning in aerial images of natural objects, such as tree categories, uncultivated land, and some man-made objects, such as roads. This valuable automation is needed to scan large areas and detect the parts for which a sudden maintenance or an emergency intervention is due. Tests on the chosen LLM were performed against a custom image dataset built to overcome the limited availability of such a domain-specific aerial image set. To evaluate the identification and captioning results, the accuracy, precision and recall metrics were computed. The results given by a cutting-edge variant of Llama-4, namely Maverick, reveal its strengths and weaknesses in this context. Although it is remarkable that an out-of-the-box tool can give assistance in such a complex observation and detection task, substantial progress is needed for such a model to improve accuracy and constitute a reliable support, as accuracy is at most 58.6% and recall is at most 56.1%.
- 1 February 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Future Internet
- Vol. 18 (2) , 77
Open AccessAerial Image Analysis: When LLMs Assist (And When Not)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable results when tasked with the analysis and production of texts or images and for captioning images. Aerial images differ from other images since they exhibit many natural objects that have a highly variable color range and no clear contours. This paper reports to what extent an LLM, i.e., Llama-4, can be tasked with the identification and captioning in aerial images of natural objects, such as tree categories, uncultivated land, and some man-made objects, such as roads. This valuable automation is needed to scan large areas and detect the parts for which a sudden maintenance or an emergency intervention is due. Tests on the chosen LLM were performed against a custom image dataset built to overcome the limited availability of such a domain-specific aerial image set. To evaluate the identification and captioning results, the accuracy, precision and recall metrics were computed. The results given by a cutting-edge variant of Llama-4, namely Maverick, reveal its strengths and weaknesses in this context. Although it is remarkable that an out-of-the-box tool can give assistance in such a complex observation and detection task, substantial progress is needed for such a model to improve accuracy and constitute a reliable support, as accuracy is at most 58.6% and recall is at most 56.1%.