Kan Etoh
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Kan Etoh has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mitsuyoshi Nakao
Department of Medical Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
20 shared publications - Jun Mitsui
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan
19 shared publications - Sugiko Watanabe
Innovative Anticancer Strategy for Therapeutics and Diagnosis Group, Innovation Center for Medical Redox Navigation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Kyushu, Japan
19 shared publications - Yuta Suzuki
The University of Tokyo
19 shared publications - Yutaka Yamamoto
Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
19 shared publications Akihito Sagara
Department of Medical Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics (IMEG), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Probe information used for deep sequencing
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Probe information used for deep sequencing
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 4 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Multimodal integration model for predicting breast cancer recurrence. A, Strategy for integrating multimodal cfDNA features using a LASSO logistic regression model. B, Comparison of ROC curves from multimodal analysis in the training set (N = 138; pBC = 99, mBC = 39) and the testing set consisting of patient-matched samples (N = 12; pBC = 6, mBC = 6). The 95% confidential intervals for the AUC are shown. C, Comparison of recurrence score in six patient-matched primary (pBC) and metastatic (mBC) samples.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 4 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Multimodal integration model for predicting breast cancer recurrence. A, Strategy for integrating multimodal cfDNA features using a LASSO logistic regression model. B, Comparison of ROC curves from multimodal analysis in the training set (N = 138; pBC = 99, mBC = 39) and the testing set consisting of patient-matched samples (N = 12; pBC = 6, mBC = 6). The 95% confidential intervals for the AUC are shown. C, Comparison of recurrence score in six patient-matched primary (pBC) and metastatic (mBC) samples.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S7 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Figure S7. Quantification of cfDNA coverage across 26 genomic loci and nucleosome scores in the HER2-positive subset.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S7 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Figure S7. Quantification of cfDNA coverage across 26 genomic loci and nucleosome scores in the HER2-positive subset.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Patients’ characteristics and clinical information.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Patients’ characteristics and clinical information.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table 1 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Sample characteristics and clinical information.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable 1 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Sample characteristics and clinical information.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers a minimally invasive approach to capture genomic and epigenetic dynamics during cancer progression. We performed targeted sequencing of 26 gene loci transcriptionally regulated during the acquisition of therapy resistance in breast cancer and analyzed blood-derived cfDNA from 150 breast cancer samples (105 primary and 45 recurrent). Recurrent samples exhibited increased genomic variant counts in both coding and noncoding regions, accompanied by shorter cfDNA fragment lengths. Furthermore, cfDNA fragmentation profiles were variable in recurrent samples, with frequently amplified loci such as ERBB2 and concurrent reductions at loci, including RERE and SYNPO2. Notably, nucleosome occupancy–derived scores from RERE and SYNPO2 distinguished recurrent from primary cancer with high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.826). Using a machine-learning approach, integration of these cfDNA features accurately predicted breast cancer relapse. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that cfDNA-based profiling focused on transcriptional alterations provides a sensitive strategy for detecting breast cancer recurrence.Significance:cfDNA-based (epi)genomic profiling captures transcriptionally regulated chromatin and nucleosome remodeling during the acquisition of therapy resistance and relapse, enabling minimally invasive, mechanistically informed detection of breast cancer recurrence. Targeting transcriptionally relevant genomic loci provide clinically actionable biomarkers to monitor therapy resistance and guide precision treatment decisions in real time.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers a minimally invasive approach to capture genomic and epigenetic dynamics during cancer progression. We performed targeted sequencing of 26 gene loci transcriptionally regulated during the acquisition of therapy resistance in breast cancer and analyzed blood-derived cfDNA from 150 breast cancer samples (105 primary and 45 recurrent). Recurrent samples exhibited increased genomic variant counts in both coding and noncoding regions, accompanied by shorter cfDNA fragment lengths. Furthermore, cfDNA fragmentation profiles were variable in recurrent samples, with frequently amplified loci such as ERBB2 and concurrent reductions at loci, including RERE and SYNPO2. Notably, nucleosome occupancy–derived scores from RERE and SYNPO2 distinguished recurrent from primary cancer with high accuracy (area under the curve = 0.826). Using a machine-learning approach, integration of these cfDNA features accurately predicted breast cancer relapse. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that cfDNA-based profiling focused on transcriptional alterations provides a sensitive strategy for detecting breast cancer recurrence.Significance:cfDNA-based (epi)genomic profiling captures transcriptionally regulated chromatin and nucleosome remodeling during the acquisition of therapy resistance and relapse, enabling minimally invasive, mechanistically informed detection of breast cancer recurrence. Targeting transcriptionally relevant genomic loci provide clinically actionable biomarkers to monitor therapy resistance and guide precision treatment decisions in real time.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure 2 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Distribution of fragment lengths and cfDNA coverage across 26 genomic loci. A, Fragment length frequency distribution of genomic (top) and mitochondrial (bottom) fraction from primary (gray) and recurrent (pink) samples. B, Comparison of fragment ratios of targeted genes in relation to CNA, calculated as the ratio of fragments shorter than 140 bp to peak fragment counts, in primary (N = 105; gray) and recurrent (N = 45; pink) samples. C, Quantification of cfDNA coverage across the 26 genomic loci. D, Comparison of cfDNA coverage of targeted genes between primary and recurrent/metastatic samples. Asterisks denote statistical significance with Welch’s t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005; ****, P < 0.0001 for the indicated comparison. E, Comparison of the SD of CNAs between primary (N = 105; gray) and recurrent/metastatic (N = 45; pink) samples. F, Relationship between CNAs and ctDNA aneuploidy fraction assessed by Spearman’s correlation in primary (N = 105; pink) and recurrent (N = 45; blue) samples.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure 2 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Distribution of fragment lengths and cfDNA coverage across 26 genomic loci. A, Fragment length frequency distribution of genomic (top) and mitochondrial (bottom) fraction from primary (gray) and recurrent (pink) samples. B, Comparison of fragment ratios of targeted genes in relation to CNA, calculated as the ratio of fragments shorter than 140 bp to peak fragment counts, in primary (N = 105; gray) and recurrent (N = 45; pink) samples. C, Quantification of cfDNA coverage across the 26 genomic loci. D, Comparison of cfDNA coverage of targeted genes between primary and recurrent/metastatic samples. Asterisks denote statistical significance with Welch’s t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.0005; ****, P < 0.0001 for the indicated comparison. E, Comparison of the SD of CNAs between primary (N = 105; gray) and recurrent/metastatic (N = 45; pink) samples. F, Relationship between CNAs and ctDNA aneuploidy fraction assessed by Spearman’s correlation in primary (N = 105; pink) and recurrent (N = 45; blue) samples.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S6 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Figure S6. Oncoprint analysis of the 26 targeted loci in clinical breast cancer samples from the TCGA study.
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S6 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Figure S6. Oncoprint analysis of the 26 targeted loci in clinical breast cancer samples from the TCGA study.
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S4 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
WPS classification by log2 fold change between recurrent and primary samples
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S4 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
WPS classification by log2 fold change between recurrent and primary samples
- Open Access
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Somatic variants analyzed using the maftools
- 15 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Transcriptionally Informed Nucleosome Profiling of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Predicts Breast Cancer Recurrence
Somatic variants analyzed using the maftools