Eduardo Gallardo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Eduardo Gallardo has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adela Saco
Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
2 shared publications - Lledo Cabedo
Radiology Department, Center for Diagnostic Imaging (CDIC), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Villaroel 107, Barcelona 08036, Spain
2 shared publications - Anna Belen Larque
Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
1 shared publication Aureli Torné
Gynecology Department (ICGON), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Villaroel 107, Barcelona 08036, Spain
1 shared publicationCarlos Nicolau
Radiology Department, Center for Diagnostic Imaging (CDIC), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Villaroel 107, Barcelona 08036, Spain
1 shared publication- Carlos Nicolau
Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Radiology Case Reports
- Vol. 21 (7) , 2805-2810
Aggressive pelvic angiomyxoma. Radiopathological correlation
- 20 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Radiology Case Reports
- Vol. 21 (7) , 2805-2810
Open AccessAggressive pelvic angiomyxoma. Radiopathological correlation
- Open Access
Differentiating Borderline from Malignant Ovarian-Adnexal Tumours: A Multimodal Predictive Approach Joining Clinical, Analytic, and MRI Parameters
Objectives: To improve the differentiation of borderline ovarian-adnexal tumours (BOTs) from malignant ovarian-adnexal masses, most of which fall into the indeterminate O-RADS MRI 4 category, by developing a multimodal predictive model that integrates clinical, analytic, and MRI parameters. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre study included 248 women who underwent standardised MRI for ovarian-adnexal mass characterisation between 2019 and 2024. Of these, 201 had true ovarian-adnexal masses (114 benign, 22 borderline, and 65 malignant), confirmed by histopathology or stability after ≥12-month follow-up. Forty-one clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables were initially assessed, and after a bivariate evaluation, 18 final predictors with clinical relevance were selected for model construction with thresholds learned from the data. A classification and regression tree (CART) model (“Full Model”) was applied as a second-stage tool after O-RADS MRI scoring, using 10-fold cross-validation to prevent overfitting. A pruned “Simplified Model” was also derived to enhance interpretability. Results: O-RADS MRI performed well at the extremes (scores 2–3 and 5) but showed limited discrimination between BOTs and malignancies within category 4 (PPV for borderline = 0.50). The decision-tree models significantly improved diagnostic performance, increasing overall accuracy from 0.856 with O-RADS MRI alone to 0.905 (Simplified Model) and 0.955 (Full Model). The PPV for BOTs within the intermediate O-RADS MRI 4 category increased from 0.49 with O-RADS MRI alone to 0.77 and 0.90 with the simplified and full models, respectively, while maintaining high accuracy for benign and malignant lesions. Conclusions: In this retrospective single-centre cohort, the addition of an interpretable rule-based predictive model as a second-line tool within O-RADS MRI category 4 was associated with improved discrimination between borderline and invasive malignant ovarian-adnexal tumours. These findings suggest that multimodal integration of clinical, laboratory, and MRI features may help refine risk stratification in indeterminate cases; however, external validation in prospective multicentre cohorts is required before clinical implementation.
Open AccessDifferentiating Borderline from Malignant Ovarian-Adnexal Tumours: A Multimodal Predictive Approach Joining Clinical, Analytic, and MRI Parameters
Objectives: To improve the differentiation of borderline ovarian-adnexal tumours (BOTs) from malignant ovarian-adnexal masses, most of which fall into the indeterminate O-RADS MRI 4 category, by developing a multimodal predictive model that integrates clinical, analytic, and MRI parameters. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre study included 248 women who underwent standardised MRI for ovarian-adnexal mass characterisation between 2019 and 2024. Of these, 201 had true ovarian-adnexal masses (114 benign, 22 borderline, and 65 malignant), confirmed by histopathology or stability after ≥12-month follow-up. Forty-one clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables were initially assessed, and after a bivariate evaluation, 18 final predictors with clinical relevance were selected for model construction with thresholds learned from the data. A classification and regression tree (CART) model (“Full Model”) was applied as a second-stage tool after O-RADS MRI scoring, using 10-fold cross-validation to prevent overfitting. A pruned “Simplified Model” was also derived to enhance interpretability. Results: O-RADS MRI performed well at the extremes (scores 2–3 and 5) but showed limited discrimination between BOTs and malignancies within category 4 (PPV for borderline = 0.50). The decision-tree models significantly improved diagnostic performance, increasing overall accuracy from 0.856 with O-RADS MRI alone to 0.905 (Simplified Model) and 0.955 (Full Model). The PPV for BOTs within the intermediate O-RADS MRI 4 category increased from 0.49 with O-RADS MRI alone to 0.77 and 0.90 with the simplified and full models, respectively, while maintaining high accuracy for benign and malignant lesions. Conclusions: In this retrospective single-centre cohort, the addition of an interpretable rule-based predictive model as a second-line tool within O-RADS MRI category 4 was associated with improved discrimination between borderline and invasive malignant ovarian-adnexal tumours. These findings suggest that multimodal integration of clinical, laboratory, and MRI features may help refine risk stratification in indeterminate cases; however, external validation in prospective multicentre cohorts is required before clinical implementation.