EGEduardo Gallardo

Eduardo Gallardo

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Eduardo Gallardo has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Aggressive pelvic angiomyxoma. Radiopathological correlation

    by Eduardo Gallardo, Carmen Sebastia, Adela Saco, Ana Larque, Lledo Cabedo, Daniel Vas, Aureli Torné, Carlos Nicolau

  • Open Access

    Differentiating Borderline from Malignant Ovarian-Adnexal Tumours: A Multimodal Predictive Approach Joining Clinical, Analytic, and MRI Parameters

    by Lledó Cabedo, Carmen Sebastià, Meritxell Munmany, Adela Saco, Eduardo Gallardo, Olatz Sáenz de Argandoña, Gonzalo Peón, Josep Lluís Carrasco, Carlos Nicolau

    Objectives: To improve the differentiation of borderline ovarian-adnexal tumours (BOTs) from malignant ovarian-adnexal masses, most of which fall into the indeterminate O-RADS MRI 4 category, by developing a multimodal predictive model that integrates clinical, analytic, and MRI parameters. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre study included 248 women who underwent standardised MRI for ovarian-adnexal mass characterisation between 2019 and 2024. Of these, 201 had true ovarian-adnexal masses (114 benign, 22 borderline, and 65 malignant), confirmed by histopathology or stability after ≥12-month follow-up. Forty-one clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables were initially assessed, and after a bivariate evaluation, 18 final predictors with clinical relevance were selected for model construction with thresholds learned from the data. A classification and regression tree (CART) model (“Full Model”) was applied as a second-stage tool after O-RADS MRI scoring, using 10-fold cross-validation to prevent overfitting. A pruned “Simplified Model” was also derived to enhance interpretability. Results: O-RADS MRI performed well at the extremes (scores 2–3 and 5) but showed limited discrimination between BOTs and malignancies within category 4 (PPV for borderline = 0.50). The decision-tree models significantly improved diagnostic performance, increasing overall accuracy from 0.856 with O-RADS MRI alone to 0.905 (Simplified Model) and 0.955 (Full Model). The PPV for BOTs within the intermediate O-RADS MRI 4 category increased from 0.49 with O-RADS MRI alone to 0.77 and 0.90 with the simplified and full models, respectively, while maintaining high accuracy for benign and malignant lesions. Conclusions: In this retrospective single-centre cohort, the addition of an interpretable rule-based predictive model as a second-line tool within O-RADS MRI category 4 was associated with improved discrimination between borderline and invasive malignant ovarian-adnexal tumours. These findings suggest that multimodal integration of clinical, laboratory, and MRI features may help refine risk stratification in indeterminate cases; however, external validation in prospective multicentre cohorts is required before clinical implementation.