Lilian Mesquita Gomes
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Lilian Mesquita Gomes has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Fernando de Melo Bomfim Moreira
Clínica de Oftalmologia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
1 shared publication Gesner Francisco Xavier Júnior
Information Science Departament, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
1 shared publication- Helena Duani
Infectious Diseases Service, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
1 shared publication Marcus Vinicius Melo de Andrade
Pós Graduação em Saúde do Adulto, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
1 shared publication- Teresa Cristina Abreu Ferrari
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde do Adulto, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena, 190, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, MG, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Internal Regulation Core as a hub of disruptive innovation in hospital management: a scoping review protocol
Introduction: This scoping review protocol aims to examine the role of the Internal Regulation Core (IRC) as an intra-hospital governance structure that coordinates capacity and patient flow and may function as a strategic hub for disruptive innovation in hospital management. By integrating organisational routines, rules and, when available, enabling technologies, IRCs may strengthen operational efficiency and contribute to higher-quality care delivery. As hospitals face increasing operational complexity and constrained resources, clarifying what IRCs are, how they are implemented across settings, and what innovations and impacts are reported has become a priority. Methods and analysis: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS) and grey literature sources, without language or date restrictions. The searches were conducted up to 6 July 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardised form; disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Findings will be synthesised descriptively and thematically, with results presented in tables and narrative summaries, including innovation streams. Trial registration number: Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HWZJS).
Open AccessInternal Regulation Core as a hub of disruptive innovation in hospital management: a scoping review protocol
Introduction: This scoping review protocol aims to examine the role of the Internal Regulation Core (IRC) as an intra-hospital governance structure that coordinates capacity and patient flow and may function as a strategic hub for disruptive innovation in hospital management. By integrating organisational routines, rules and, when available, enabling technologies, IRCs may strengthen operational efficiency and contribute to higher-quality care delivery. As hospitals face increasing operational complexity and constrained resources, clarifying what IRCs are, how they are implemented across settings, and what innovations and impacts are reported has become a priority. Methods and analysis: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS) and grey literature sources, without language or date restrictions. The searches were conducted up to 6 July 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardised form; disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Findings will be synthesised descriptively and thematically, with results presented in tables and narrative summaries, including innovation streams. Trial registration number: Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HWZJS).