Dumitru Ştefan Coman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Dumitru Ştefan Coman has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dana Rad
Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
1 shared publication - Gavril Rad
Centre of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, 310032 Arad, Romania
1 shared publication - Maria Iulia Felea
Department for Teacher Training, “1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania
1 shared publication - Miron Gavril Popescu
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
1 shared publication - Narcisa Carmen Mladin
Department of Internal Medicine, “Vasile Goldis” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
1 shared publication - Radiana Marcu
Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 16 (5) , 473
Algorithmic Habituation: A Neurocognitive and Systems-Based Framework for Human–AI Co-Adaptation
Background/Objectives: As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly embedded in everyday cognitive tasks, human–AI interaction is no longer limited to tool use but evolves into a dynamic process of mutual adaptation. While extensive research has examined algorithmic learning, far less attention has been given to how users progressively adapt to AI systems. This paper introduces the concept of algorithmic habituation, defined as the gradual accommodation of users to the regularities and predictive patterns of AI systems. The objective is to provide a neurocognitive and systems-based framework that explains this phenomenon. Methods: The study develops a conceptual and integrative framework grounded in classical theories of habituation, neuroplasticity, predictive processing, and systems theory. Building on these foundations, we propose a mechanistic model of human–AI co-adaptation, conceptualized as a recursive feedback loop involving repeated interaction, pattern recognition, expectation stabilization, and cognitive economy. In addition, a typology of algorithmic habituation is advanced, alongside proposed empirical pathways for future validation, including scale development, experimental paradigms, and longitudinal designs. Results: The proposed framework suggests that repeated interaction with AI systems leads to stabilization of cognitive expectations, reduced cognitive effort, and increased behavioral standardization. This process extends beyond perceptual habituation into higher-order domains, including decision-making, creativity, and moral judgment. The typology identifies four primary forms of algorithmic habituation: cognitive, decisional, creative, and moral. The model predicts both adaptive outcomes (efficiency, reduced cognitive load) and maladaptive consequences (reduced reflexivity, automation bias, and potential erosion of critical thinking). Conclusions: Algorithmic habituation represents a novel construct at the intersection of neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and human–AI interaction. By framing user adaptation as a form of neurocognitively grounded habituation within recursive systems, this paper contributes a new perspective to understanding AI integration in human cognition. The framework has implications for digital wellbeing, education, and AI ethics, and opens multiple avenues for empirical research.
- 28 April 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 16 (5) , 473
Open AccessAlgorithmic Habituation: A Neurocognitive and Systems-Based Framework for Human–AI Co-Adaptation
Background/Objectives: As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly embedded in everyday cognitive tasks, human–AI interaction is no longer limited to tool use but evolves into a dynamic process of mutual adaptation. While extensive research has examined algorithmic learning, far less attention has been given to how users progressively adapt to AI systems. This paper introduces the concept of algorithmic habituation, defined as the gradual accommodation of users to the regularities and predictive patterns of AI systems. The objective is to provide a neurocognitive and systems-based framework that explains this phenomenon. Methods: The study develops a conceptual and integrative framework grounded in classical theories of habituation, neuroplasticity, predictive processing, and systems theory. Building on these foundations, we propose a mechanistic model of human–AI co-adaptation, conceptualized as a recursive feedback loop involving repeated interaction, pattern recognition, expectation stabilization, and cognitive economy. In addition, a typology of algorithmic habituation is advanced, alongside proposed empirical pathways for future validation, including scale development, experimental paradigms, and longitudinal designs. Results: The proposed framework suggests that repeated interaction with AI systems leads to stabilization of cognitive expectations, reduced cognitive effort, and increased behavioral standardization. This process extends beyond perceptual habituation into higher-order domains, including decision-making, creativity, and moral judgment. The typology identifies four primary forms of algorithmic habituation: cognitive, decisional, creative, and moral. The model predicts both adaptive outcomes (efficiency, reduced cognitive load) and maladaptive consequences (reduced reflexivity, automation bias, and potential erosion of critical thinking). Conclusions: Algorithmic habituation represents a novel construct at the intersection of neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and human–AI interaction. By framing user adaptation as a form of neurocognitively grounded habituation within recursive systems, this paper contributes a new perspective to understanding AI integration in human cognition. The framework has implications for digital wellbeing, education, and AI ethics, and opens multiple avenues for empirical research.
- Open Access
- 27 December 2022
- Published by SARA Law Research Center in International Journal of Legal and Social Order
- Vol. 1 (1)
CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE SCOPE OF NOTIONS OF "EXCEPTIONAL SITUATIONS"
From the beginning of the existence of state entities, measures were necessary to maintain and defend them against internal and external dangers. At the beginning, these measures were taken exclusively in military terms, later taking shape also in law and evolving simultaneously with state development. This evolution has outlined other risk factors, which can threaten the existence of the rule of law or the normal development of social, economic and political life. In order to combat these dangers, which can intervene unexpectedly, and to establish the state of normalcy as quickly as possible, the power factors in the state must take energetic and immediate measures. The content of exceptional states derives from those situations that are beyond the normal state of the rule of law, situations accompanied by serious dangers that may threaten its very existence or the normal development of social, economic and political life.
- 27 December 2022
- Published by SARA Law Research Center in International Journal of Legal and Social Order
- Vol. 1 (1)
Open AccessCONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE SCOPE OF NOTIONS OF "EXCEPTIONAL SITUATIONS"
From the beginning of the existence of state entities, measures were necessary to maintain and defend them against internal and external dangers. At the beginning, these measures were taken exclusively in military terms, later taking shape also in law and evolving simultaneously with state development. This evolution has outlined other risk factors, which can threaten the existence of the rule of law or the normal development of social, economic and political life. In order to combat these dangers, which can intervene unexpectedly, and to establish the state of normalcy as quickly as possible, the power factors in the state must take energetic and immediate measures. The content of exceptional states derives from those situations that are beyond the normal state of the rule of law, situations accompanied by serious dangers that may threaten its very existence or the normal development of social, economic and political life.